Students' situational motivation in climate education – a multilevel profile approach

In the present study, we aimed to identify how students' motivation varied in various learning situations in climate education. The motivation was evaluated through interest, competence, perceived task difficulty, effort and anxiety based on situated expectancy-value theory. Using ecological momentary assessment, we collected data from 3695 situations of 354 Finnish upper secondary school students. By applying Multilevel Latent Profile Analyses, six situational motivation patterns were identified: Amotivating situations (15 %), Difficult situations (9 %), Moderately motivating situations (50 %), Low demanding situations (12 %), Easy situations (9 %), and Highly motivating situations (5 %). Situational patterns were differently associated with various learning activities. Based on the relative prevalence of situational patterns, three student motivation profiles were identified: Weakly motivated (21 %), Moderately motivated (59 %), and Interested and competent (20 %). Results showed that there are more science programme students and males in the Interested and competent profile. In addition, students in science programmes had higher test scores. Climate change is an important part of the Finnish school curriculum today. However, research has not yet found the single best way to motivate students to learn about it, including how to mitigate or adapt to it. This highlights the need to find new ways to motivate students on these important topics. Therefore, we investigated students' motivation in several learning situations to gain information on how students' motivation varies in different learning activities in the climate education module. Our findings showed that motivation to learn about climate change varies from situation to situation and from student to student. No learning style is suitable for everyone, but our research suggests that project-based learning could be a good way to teach about climate change. The issues should first be explored together, and then students can come up with solutions to the problems themselves. In addition, the results showed that a previous interest in science leads to higher motivation. Men were found to have higher levels of interest and competence. • Ecological momentary assessment data was examined with multilevel profile analysis • Six situational patterns and three student motivation profiles were identified • Students reported high motivation when generating ideas • Males and science programme students were more interested in the climate education • Science programme students had higher test performance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102698
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students' situational motivation in climate education – a multilevel profile approach

Veli-Matti Vesterinen, Inka Ronkainen, Jussi Järvinen, Jari Lavonen et al.
2 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
4.24
article

Students' situational motivation in climate education – a multilevel profile approach

Veli-Matti Vesterinen, Inka Ronkainen, Jussi Järvinen, Jari Lavonen, Lars‐Erik Malmberg, Miikka Turkkila, Katariina Salmela‐Aro
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to identify how students' motivation varied in various learning situations in climate education. The motivation was evaluated through interest, competence, perceived task difficulty, effort and anxiety based on situated expectancy-value theory. Using ecological momentary assessment, we collected data from 3695 situations of 354 Finnish upper secondary school students. By applying Multilevel Latent Profile Analyses, six situational motivation patterns were identified: Amotivating situations (15 %), Difficult situations (9 %), Moderately motivating situations (50 %), Low demanding situations (12 %), Easy situations (9 %), and Highly motivating situations (5 %). Situational patterns were differently associated with various learning activities. Based on the relative prevalence of situational patterns, three student motivation profiles were identified: Weakly motivated (21 %), Moderately motivated (59 %), and Interested and competent (20 %). Results showed that there are more science programme students and males in the Interested and competent profile. In addition, students in science programmes had higher test scores. Climate change is an important part of the Finnish school curriculum today. However, research has not yet found the single best way to motivate students to learn about it, including how to mitigate or adapt to it. This highlights the need to find new ways to motivate students on these important topics. Therefore, we investigated students' motivation in several learning situations to gain information on how students' motivation varies in different learning activities in the climate education module. Our findings showed that motivation to learn about climate change varies from situation to situation and from student to student. No learning style is suitable for everyone, but our research suggests that project-based learning could be a good way to teach about climate change. The issues should first be explored together, and then students can come up with solutions to the problems themselves. In addition, the results showed that a previous interest in science leads to higher motivation. Men were found to have higher levels of interest and competence. • Ecological momentary assessment data was examined with multilevel profile analysis • Six situational patterns and three student motivation profiles were identified • Students reported high motivation when generating ideas • Males and science programme students were more interested in the climate education • Science programme students had higher test performance

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 120
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI), University of Oxford (GB)
Academy of Finland
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.