Anticipating the Storm: Expectations (not experience) of extreme weather predict public support for climate policies

The psychological effects of experiencing climate change-related extreme weather events have spurred researchers' interest. While existing literature suggests a direct link between first-hand experiences of extreme weather and policy support, we propose an interplay between experience and expectations of future extreme weather events. Through a cross-sectional survey of 1295 participants across four countries, we investigated the mediating effect of extreme weather expectations on the relationship between experience and policy support. Results revealed that expecting more severe future weather conditions was related to supporting climate change mitigation policies, fully mediating the relationship with past experiences. Importantly, climate change concerns emerged as a proximal determinant of support, mediating the relationship of expectations. These results seek to provide a nuance to the relationship between past experiences and policy support by suggesting that it is mediated by people's expectations of future extreme weather events. • We assessed a cross-national perspective on extreme weather and climate policy support from 1295 participants (USA, UK, Germany, and Australia). • The direct effect of experience on climate policy support was fully mediated by expecting more severe weather events in the future. • Findings stress the role of public expectations in shaping policy attitudes and highlight the need for longitudinal and experimental research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102593
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticipating the Storm: Expectations (not experience) of extreme weather predict public support for climate policies

София Скипор, Niklas Harring, Magnus Bergquist
4 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Climate Change Communication and Perception
16.81
article

Anticipating the Storm: Expectations (not experience) of extreme weather predict public support for climate policies

София Скипор, Niklas Harring, Magnus Bergquist
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The psychological effects of experiencing climate change-related extreme weather events have spurred researchers' interest. While existing literature suggests a direct link between first-hand experiences of extreme weather and policy support, we propose an interplay between experience and expectations of future extreme weather events. Through a cross-sectional survey of 1295 participants across four countries, we investigated the mediating effect of extreme weather expectations on the relationship between experience and policy support. Results revealed that expecting more severe future weather conditions was related to supporting climate change mitigation policies, fully mediating the relationship with past experiences. Importantly, climate change concerns emerged as a proximal determinant of support, mediating the relationship of expectations. These results seek to provide a nuance to the relationship between past experiences and policy support by suggesting that it is mediated by people's expectations of future extreme weather events. • We assessed a cross-national perspective on extreme weather and climate policy support from 1295 participants (USA, UK, Germany, and Australia). • The direct effect of experience on climate policy support was fully mediated by expecting more severe weather events in the future. • Findings stress the role of public expectations in shaping policy attitudes and highlight the need for longitudinal and experimental research.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 104
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
16.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.