Translating Technology Into Speech–Language Pathology Practice: Qualitative Interviews Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Case Study

What is already known on the subject Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might one day be used as a treatment for communication and swallowing disorders, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) will likely be responsible for delivering this treatment. Previous research has investigated SLPs' opinions and attitudes towards TMS to identify determinants of SLP behaviour that could impact translation of TMS into practice. However, more in-depth investigation is required within the context of profession-wide translation issues. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge The present study highlights behavioural determinants that could impact translation of TMS, as well as profession-wide research-to-practice gaps. We suggest important strategies and lines of enquiry to bridge translation gaps for use of technologies in speech-language pathology, which are summarised as a taxonomy of nine recommendations. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Results from this study may help SLPs to acknowledge and characterise translation issues in their own practice and across the broader profession. Our taxonomy of recommendations can be used in clinical, research, and implementation science settings to address technology translation issues in speech-language pathology, facilitating future integration of TMS and other technologies into practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.70041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating Technology Into Speech–Language Pathology Practice: Qualitative Interviews Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Case Study

Stacie Attrill, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Brenton Hordacre, Nigel C. Rogasch et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
Voice and Speech Disorders
1.16
article

Translating Technology Into Speech–Language Pathology Practice: Qualitative Interviews Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Case Study

Stacie Attrill, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Brenton Hordacre, Nigel C. Rogasch, Ellen E. R. Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What is already known on the subject Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might one day be used as a treatment for communication and swallowing disorders, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) will likely be responsible for delivering this treatment. Previous research has investigated SLPs' opinions and attitudes towards TMS to identify determinants of SLP behaviour that could impact translation of TMS into practice. However, more in-depth investigation is required within the context of profession-wide translation issues. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge The present study highlights behavioural determinants that could impact translation of TMS, as well as profession-wide research-to-practice gaps. We suggest important strategies and lines of enquiry to bridge translation gaps for use of technologies in speech-language pathology, which are summarised as a taxonomy of nine recommendations. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Results from this study may help SLPs to acknowledge and characterise translation issues in their own practice and across the broader profession. Our taxonomy of recommendations can be used in clinical, research, and implementation science settings to address technology translation issues in speech-language pathology, facilitating future integration of TMS and other technologies into practice.

International Journal of Language & Communication DisordersVol. 60(3)
University of South Australia (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Government, University of Adelaide
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Voice and Speech Disorders
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.