Navigating the business model design space: A case of insects as food and feed in Sweden

Business model innovation (BMI) plays a key role in driving sustainability transitions, yet its interplay with the broader socio-technical system is often overlooked. This study investigates BMI in the emerging niche of insect-based food and feed in Sweden, employing a combined Business Model Design Space (BMDS) and dynamic capabilities perspective. Drawing on interviews with ten insect firms, we examine how firm-level dynamic capabilities shape BMI strategies and interact with the BMDS. Our findings show that firms adopt different strategies to navigate the opportunities and constraints they perceive within the BMDS. We introduce a novel typology that outlines how firms perceive and respond to the BMDS through two dimensions: BMDS Sensing (systematic & intuitive) and BMDS Enactment (fit-and-conform & stretch-and-transform). This typology identifies four distinct BMI seizing modes: Analytical Adaptation, Analytical Shaping, Instinctive Adaptation, and Instinctive Shaping, highlighting how firms interpret and enact the BMDS through BMI. By integrating dynamic capabilities theory with the BMDS framework, we address the gap of accounting for varied perceptions of the BMDS among different actors. We show how firms exercise strategic agency in shaping and responding to system-level dynamics, offering new theoretical insights that bridge firm-level and system-level perspectives on BMI within emerging niches. • Firms navigate BMDS by sensing and seizing opportunities through BMI. • A novel typology reveals four distinct BMI seizing modes. • Typology distinguishes systematic and intuitive BMDS sensing. • Integrates dynamic capabilities with BMDS, linking firm and system levels. • Highlights firms' strategic agency in responding to socio-technical context

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124148
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the business model design space: A case of insects as food and feed in Sweden

Linus Thomson, Thomas Taro Lennerfors, Chattraporn Chatthong
3 citations
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Insect Utilization and Effects
5.02
article

Navigating the business model design space: A case of insects as food and feed in Sweden

Linus Thomson, Thomas Taro Lennerfors, Chattraporn Chatthong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Business model innovation (BMI) plays a key role in driving sustainability transitions, yet its interplay with the broader socio-technical system is often overlooked. This study investigates BMI in the emerging niche of insect-based food and feed in Sweden, employing a combined Business Model Design Space (BMDS) and dynamic capabilities perspective. Drawing on interviews with ten insect firms, we examine how firm-level dynamic capabilities shape BMI strategies and interact with the BMDS. Our findings show that firms adopt different strategies to navigate the opportunities and constraints they perceive within the BMDS. We introduce a novel typology that outlines how firms perceive and respond to the BMDS through two dimensions: BMDS Sensing (systematic & intuitive) and BMDS Enactment (fit-and-conform & stretch-and-transform). This typology identifies four distinct BMI seizing modes: Analytical Adaptation, Analytical Shaping, Instinctive Adaptation, and Instinctive Shaping, highlighting how firms interpret and enact the BMDS through BMI. By integrating dynamic capabilities theory with the BMDS framework, we address the gap of accounting for varied perceptions of the BMDS among different actors. We show how firms exercise strategic agency in shaping and responding to system-level dynamics, offering new theoretical insights that bridge firm-level and system-level perspectives on BMI within emerging niches. • Firms navigate BMDS by sensing and seizing opportunities through BMI. • A novel typology reveals four distinct BMI seizing modes. • Typology distinguishes systematic and intuitive BMDS sensing. • Integrates dynamic capabilities with BMDS, linking firm and system levels. • Highlights firms' strategic agency in responding to socio-technical context

Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeVol. 216
Uppsala University (SE), Lund University (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Insect Utilization and Effects
5.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.