Assessing the impact of agrifood byproduct-based bioplastics on soil microbial communities and functioning

The environmental burden of plastic pollution has driven the search for sustainable alternatives, such as biodegradable bioplastics derived from agrifood byproducts, which hold the potential for addressing global waste management challenges. Given the close relationship between the biodegradability of biopolymers and soil microbial activities, it is vital to understand how the presence of novel bioplastics affects their function and structure. This study assessed microbial responses to different plastics: potato starch-based bioplastic, locust bean-based bioplastic, and non-biodegradable polyamide-polyethylene plastic in natural sandy-loam soil (LUFA 2.2). Soil without any (bio)plastics was used as a control. Despite initial pronounced differences in defragmentation rates between the two types of bioplastics, only 10 and 20 % w/w of the fragments were recovered after 17 weeks. The type of bioplastic influenced the fungal colonization pattern, with potato starch-based bioplastic resulting in more isolated fungal species than locust bean-based bioplastic. The soil dehydrogenase response was inconsistent, while β-glucosidase activity showed an initial increase in both bioplastic treatments, with a sustained stimulation only in potato starch-based bioplastic. β-glucosidase activity coincided with higher carbon substrate consumption maintained by the end of the 17 weeks of exposure, indicating more dynamic changes in microbial functions in potato starch-based bioplastic. Decreased carbon substrate consumption was observed in non-biodegradable polyamide-polyethylene plastic. The current study represents a first screening approach for the impact of applying agrifood byproducts as novel biopolymers directly in the soil, demonstrating their distinct effects without any pronounced adverse effects on soil microbiota compared to conventional polyamide-polyethylene plastic. • Bioplastics from agrifood byproducts influenced soil microbial dynamics. • Potato starch-based bioplastic supported more isolated fungal species. • Bioplastics stimulated microbial activity and promoted soil multifunctionality. • Carbon substrate utilization increased in bioplastic-treated soils. • Synthetic plastic exhibited lower carbon consumption compared to bioplastics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2025.106083
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of agrifood byproduct-based bioplastics on soil microbial communities and functioning

Sara Peixoto, Micael F. M. Gonçalves, Susana Loureiro, Joana Lopes et al.
2 citations
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.01
article

Assessing the impact of agrifood byproduct-based bioplastics on soil microbial communities and functioning

Sara Peixoto, Micael F. M. Gonçalves, Susana Loureiro, Joana Lopes, Sandra Hilário, Marija Prodana, Idalina Gonçalves, Artur Alves, Catarina Malheiro, Rui G. Morgado, Manuel A. Coimbra, Paula Ferreira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The environmental burden of plastic pollution has driven the search for sustainable alternatives, such as biodegradable bioplastics derived from agrifood byproducts, which hold the potential for addressing global waste management challenges. Given the close relationship between the biodegradability of biopolymers and soil microbial activities, it is vital to understand how the presence of novel bioplastics affects their function and structure. This study assessed microbial responses to different plastics: potato starch-based bioplastic, locust bean-based bioplastic, and non-biodegradable polyamide-polyethylene plastic in natural sandy-loam soil (LUFA 2.2). Soil without any (bio)plastics was used as a control. Despite initial pronounced differences in defragmentation rates between the two types of bioplastics, only 10 and 20 % w/w of the fragments were recovered after 17 weeks. The type of bioplastic influenced the fungal colonization pattern, with potato starch-based bioplastic resulting in more isolated fungal species than locust bean-based bioplastic. The soil dehydrogenase response was inconsistent, while β-glucosidase activity showed an initial increase in both bioplastic treatments, with a sustained stimulation only in potato starch-based bioplastic. β-glucosidase activity coincided with higher carbon substrate consumption maintained by the end of the 17 weeks of exposure, indicating more dynamic changes in microbial functions in potato starch-based bioplastic. Decreased carbon substrate consumption was observed in non-biodegradable polyamide-polyethylene plastic. The current study represents a first screening approach for the impact of applying agrifood byproducts as novel biopolymers directly in the soil, demonstrating their distinct effects without any pronounced adverse effects on soil microbiota compared to conventional polyamide-polyethylene plastic. • Bioplastics from agrifood byproducts influenced soil microbial dynamics. • Potato starch-based bioplastic supported more isolated fungal species. • Bioplastics stimulated microbial activity and promoted soil multifunctionality. • Carbon substrate utilization increased in bioplastic-treated soils. • Synthetic plastic exhibited lower carbon consumption compared to bioplastics.

International Biodeterioration & BiodegradationVol. 202
Centro de Estudos em Geografia e Ordenamento do Territorio (PT), University of Aveiro (PT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.