Candidate bow shock stars: Spectral analysis and environment

Aims . Infrared bow shocks are arc-shaped structures located ahead of a star and generally observed at mid- to far-IR wavelengths. They are thought to result from the interaction of the stellar wind with the ambient interstellar medium and are typically (but not always) related to runaway stars. However, the formation of bow shocks seems to be dominated by local environmental factors rather than stellar motion. In this context, we aim to probe the links between bow-shock driving stars and their environment. Methods . We observed 47 bow shock driving star candidates with the Multi-purpose InSTRument for Astronomy at Low-resolution (MISTRAL) spectro-imager at Haute-Provence Observatory (OHP) in the 420–800 nm range to perform spectral classification of the candidate stars. In parallel, we evaluated the transverse motion of stars from GAIA DR3 in order to determine whether they are runaways. We then characterised the bow shock environmental conditions. Results . We find that among the 47 candidates we have 3 unclassifiable stars (suspected to be G- or K-type stars), 3 M- or K-type stars, 2 A-type stars, 10 O stars, and 29 B (mainly giant and supergiant) stars. We find that 17 stars (among the 37 with determined transverse velocity) are runaways, among which only 7 have their transverse velocity aligned to the bow-shock axis. This suggests that runaway is not the only origin for bow shock formation. We note the diversity of environments where bow shocks are observed: stellar associations, a cluster, and H II regions. For most stars, the origin of the bow shock is not clear; however, the 11 bow shocks observed in the Cygnus OB stellar association suggest that the ISM conditions in such regions favour bow shock observability. We also identify that the bow shock ahead of the star ionising the H II region Sh2-135 could be produced by a photoevaporated flow of about 16 km/s coming from the H II region molecular cloud’s interface. Finally, for six stars we were able to identify the cluster from which they were ejected and determine the ejection process (dynamical ejection from star cluster or binary supernovae scenarios). Conclusions . The formation of bow shocks seems to be dominated by local environmental factors rather than stellar motion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452262
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Candidate bow shock stars: Spectral analysis and environment

J.‐C. Bouret, C. Adami, A. Zavagno, D. Russeil
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Candidate bow shock stars: Spectral analysis and environment

J.‐C. Bouret, C. Adami, A. Zavagno, D. Russeil
article en

Abstract

Aims . Infrared bow shocks are arc-shaped structures located ahead of a star and generally observed at mid- to far-IR wavelengths. They are thought to result from the interaction of the stellar wind with the ambient interstellar medium and are typically (but not always) related to runaway stars. However, the formation of bow shocks seems to be dominated by local environmental factors rather than stellar motion. In this context, we aim to probe the links between bow-shock driving stars and their environment. Methods . We observed 47 bow shock driving star candidates with the Multi-purpose InSTRument for Astronomy at Low-resolution (MISTRAL) spectro-imager at Haute-Provence Observatory (OHP) in the 420–800 nm range to perform spectral classification of the candidate stars. In parallel, we evaluated the transverse motion of stars from GAIA DR3 in order to determine whether they are runaways. We then characterised the bow shock environmental conditions. Results . We find that among the 47 candidates we have 3 unclassifiable stars (suspected to be G- or K-type stars), 3 M- or K-type stars, 2 A-type stars, 10 O stars, and 29 B (mainly giant and supergiant) stars. We find that 17 stars (among the 37 with determined transverse velocity) are runaways, among which only 7 have their transverse velocity aligned to the bow-shock axis. This suggests that runaway is not the only origin for bow shock formation. We note the diversity of environments where bow shocks are observed: stellar associations, a cluster, and H II regions. For most stars, the origin of the bow shock is not clear; however, the 11 bow shocks observed in the Cygnus OB stellar association suggest that the ISM conditions in such regions favour bow shock observability. We also identify that the bow shock ahead of the star ionising the H II region Sh2-135 could be produced by a photoevaporated flow of about 16 km/s coming from the H II region molecular cloud’s interface. Finally, for six stars we were able to identify the cluster from which they were ejected and determine the ejection process (dynamical ejection from star cluster or binary supernovae scenarios). Conclusions . The formation of bow shocks seems to be dominated by local environmental factors rather than stellar motion.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 698
Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (FR), Château Gombert (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.