Optimizing laser powder bed fusion parameters for enhanced hardness of Ti6Al4V alloys: A comparative analysis of metaheuristic algorithms for process parameter optimization

This study investigates the influence of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) processing parameters of high-performance Ti6Al4V components on mechanical properties and microstructural uniformity. Experimental results indicate that lower laser power (200–203 W) and moderate scan speeds (600–604 mm/s) optimize the hardness and the Hatch distance (0.10–0.11 mm) and layer thickness (0.04–0.05 mm) significantly impact hardness, with specific parameter combinations yielding superior results. A comparative assessment of six metaheuristic algorithms, such as the JAYA algorithm, Cohort Intelligence (CI), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Simulated Annealing (SA), was performed for LPBF parameter optimization. JAYA and CI exhibited the fastest convergence, achieving peak fitness values within the first five iterations and demonstrating high stability with minimal oscillations. The results show a significant improvement in hardness, consistently ranging between 560 and 570 HV. JAYA and CI reached comparable maximal hardness measurements at 570 HV, which agreed with the laboratory-reported 428.6 HV value. The HYV values obtained by PSO and TLBO algorithms were competitive at about 569.5 HV yet displayed reduced accuracy in their results. GA and SA showed moderate to slow convergence speed, which led to unreliable precision in their application. JAYA and CI demonstrate better performance through their effective balancing capability of exploitation and exploration processes that enable rapid and stable convergence. Given its simplicity alongside its accuracy and robust performance, the JAYA algorithm proves the most appropriate method for LPBF parameter optimization. Real-time applications benefit from CI as a promising solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0262978
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing laser powder bed fusion parameters for enhanced hardness of Ti6Al4V alloys: A comparative analysis of metaheuristic algorithms for process parameter optimization

Vinaykumar S. Jatti, A. Johnson Santhosh, Praveen Kumar D, Vijaykumar S. Jatti et al.
4 citations
AIP Advances
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
article

Optimizing laser powder bed fusion parameters for enhanced hardness of Ti6Al4V alloys: A comparative analysis of metaheuristic algorithms for process parameter optimization

Vinaykumar S. Jatti, A. Johnson Santhosh, Praveen Kumar D, Vijaykumar S. Jatti, A. Saiyathibrahim, V. Praveenkumar, Murali Krishnan R
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) processing parameters of high-performance Ti6Al4V components on mechanical properties and microstructural uniformity. Experimental results indicate that lower laser power (200–203 W) and moderate scan speeds (600–604 mm/s) optimize the hardness and the Hatch distance (0.10–0.11 mm) and layer thickness (0.04–0.05 mm) significantly impact hardness, with specific parameter combinations yielding superior results. A comparative assessment of six metaheuristic algorithms, such as the JAYA algorithm, Cohort Intelligence (CI), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Simulated Annealing (SA), was performed for LPBF parameter optimization. JAYA and CI exhibited the fastest convergence, achieving peak fitness values within the first five iterations and demonstrating high stability with minimal oscillations. The results show a significant improvement in hardness, consistently ranging between 560 and 570 HV. JAYA and CI reached comparable maximal hardness measurements at 570 HV, which agreed with the laboratory-reported 428.6 HV value. The HYV values obtained by PSO and TLBO algorithms were competitive at about 569.5 HV yet displayed reduced accuracy in their results. GA and SA showed moderate to slow convergence speed, which led to unreliable precision in their application. JAYA and CI demonstrate better performance through their effective balancing capability of exploitation and exploration processes that enable rapid and stable convergence. Given its simplicity alongside its accuracy and robust performance, the JAYA algorithm proves the most appropriate method for LPBF parameter optimization. Real-time applications benefit from CI as a promising solution.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(4)
Chandigarh University (IN), Jimma University (ET), Symbiosis International University (IN), Bennett University (IN), Park University (US), Centre for Research and Development (ZW), Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
2.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.