Navigating and attributing uncertainty in future tropical cyclone risk estimates

Future tropical cyclone risks will evolve with climate change and socioeconomic development, entailing substantial uncertainties. An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of these risks is vital, yet the chosen model setup influences outcomes. This study investigates how much future tropical cyclone risks are driven by climate and socioeconomic changes, quantifies uncertainty from propagating alternate representations of these systems through the risk modeling chain, and evaluates how strongly each model input contributes to output uncertainty. By comparing these three elements-drivers, uncertainty, and sensitivity-across four distinct tropical cyclone models, we derive findings generalizable beyond individual model setups. We find that average tropical cyclone risk will increase 1 to 5% by 2050 globally, with maximum increases ranging from 10 to 400% by 2100, depending on tropical cyclone model choice, region, and risk model inputs, while the dominant source of uncertainty shifts with modeling choices. Last, we differentiate between aleatory, epistemic, and normative uncertainties, offering guidance to reduce them and inform better decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn4607
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating and attributing uncertainty in future tropical cyclone risk estimates

Chia‐Ying Lee, Simona Meiler, Adam H. Sobel, Chahan M. Kropf et al.
8 citations
Science Advances
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
10.41
article

Navigating and attributing uncertainty in future tropical cyclone risk estimates

Chia‐Ying Lee, Simona Meiler, Adam H. Sobel, Chahan M. Kropf, Suzana J. Camargo, Nadia Bloemendaal, Jamie W. McCaughey, David N. Bresch, Kerry Emanuel
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Future tropical cyclone risks will evolve with climate change and socioeconomic development, entailing substantial uncertainties. An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of these risks is vital, yet the chosen model setup influences outcomes. This study investigates how much future tropical cyclone risks are driven by climate and socioeconomic changes, quantifies uncertainty from propagating alternate representations of these systems through the risk modeling chain, and evaluates how strongly each model input contributes to output uncertainty. By comparing these three elements-drivers, uncertainty, and sensitivity-across four distinct tropical cyclone models, we derive findings generalizable beyond individual model setups. We find that average tropical cyclone risk will increase 1 to 5% by 2050 globally, with maximum increases ranging from 10 to 400% by 2100, depending on tropical cyclone model choice, region, and risk model inputs, while the dominant source of uncertainty shifts with modeling choices. Last, we differentiate between aleatory, epistemic, and normative uncertainties, offering guidance to reduce them and inform better decision-making.

Science AdvancesVol. 11(16)
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss (CH), Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Columbia University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
10.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.