What is reproducibility in artificial intelligence and machine learning research?

Abstract In the rapidly evolving fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), the reproducibility crisis underscores the urgent need for clear validation methodologies to maintain scientific integrity and encourage advancement. The crisis is compounded by the prevalent confusion over validation terminology. In response to this challenge, we introduce a framework that clarifies the roles and definitions of key validation efforts: repeatability, dependent and independent reproducibility, and direct and conceptual replicability. This structured framework aims to provide AI/ML researchers with the necessary clarity on these essential concepts, facilitating the appropriate design, conduct, and interpretation of validation studies. By articulating the nuances and specific roles of each type of validation study, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of research findings and support the community's efforts to address reproducibility challenges effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Magazine
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.70004
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is reproducibility in artificial intelligence and machine learning research?

Abhyuday Desai, Mohamed Abdel‐Hamid, Nakul R. Padalkar
11 citations
AI Magazine
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
27.29
article

What is reproducibility in artificial intelligence and machine learning research?

Abhyuday Desai, Mohamed Abdel‐Hamid, Nakul R. Padalkar
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the rapidly evolving fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), the reproducibility crisis underscores the urgent need for clear validation methodologies to maintain scientific integrity and encourage advancement. The crisis is compounded by the prevalent confusion over validation terminology. In response to this challenge, we introduce a framework that clarifies the roles and definitions of key validation efforts: repeatability, dependent and independent reproducibility, and direct and conceptual replicability. This structured framework aims to provide AI/ML researchers with the necessary clarity on these essential concepts, facilitating the appropriate design, conduct, and interpretation of validation studies. By articulating the nuances and specific roles of each type of validation study, we aim to enhance the reliability and trustworthiness of research findings and support the community's efforts to address reproducibility challenges effectively.

AI MagazineVol. 46(2)
Boston University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
27.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is reproducibility in artificial intelligence and machine learning research? — Abhyuday Desai, Mohamed Abdel‐Hamid, et al. · AI Magazine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS