Evaluating student stress in an animal science course with unsupervised livestock experience

In recent years, Animal Science demographics have been shifting from many students having an abundance of animal experience towards a majority of students having little to no prior animal experience. It’s important to note this demographic shift and to consider how this shift could be impacting student mental health. Throughout a semester long parturition management course with unsupervised animal experiences, physiological and psychological stress data were collected along with student demographic data and prior animal experience levels. Caucasian participants were more psychologically stressed than non-Caucasian participants (P = 0.04). Participants with beginner level animal experience tended to have higher stress levels than participants with mid-level animal experience (P = 0.08). However, physiological stress results showed no differences among demographic variables nor prior animal experience. Future studies should investigate student stress in introductory animal courses to better understand their initial stress when working with animals at the collegiate level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NACTA Journal
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v69i1.235
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating student stress in an animal science course with unsupervised livestock experience

Drew Lugar, Mark Knowles, Jayden Lawrence, J. W. Rickard
NACTA Journal
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Evaluating student stress in an animal science course with unsupervised livestock experience

Drew Lugar, Mark Knowles, Jayden Lawrence, J. W. Rickard
article en

Abstract

In recent years, Animal Science demographics have been shifting from many students having an abundance of animal experience towards a majority of students having little to no prior animal experience. It’s important to note this demographic shift and to consider how this shift could be impacting student mental health. Throughout a semester long parturition management course with unsupervised animal experiences, physiological and psychological stress data were collected along with student demographic data and prior animal experience levels. Caucasian participants were more psychologically stressed than non-Caucasian participants (P = 0.04). Participants with beginner level animal experience tended to have higher stress levels than participants with mid-level animal experience (P = 0.08). However, physiological stress results showed no differences among demographic variables nor prior animal experience. Future studies should investigate student stress in introductory animal courses to better understand their initial stress when working with animals at the collegiate level.

NACTA JournalVol. 69(1)
Illinois State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating student stress in an animal science course with unsupervised livestock experience — Drew Lugar, Mark Knowles, et al. · NACTA Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS