Unsupervised Machine Learning Prediction of a Novel 1:3 Intermetallic Phase with the Synthesis of TbIr <sub>3</sub> (PuNi <sub>3</sub> -type) as Experimental Validation

Crystal structure classification of binary intermetallic structures with 1:3 stoichiometry was done with machine learning algorithms. The data set included 97 features and a total of 2366 reported compounds adopting six different structure types. An unsupervised learning method based on principal component analysis (PCA) followed by clustering using the K-means method was applied to cluster compounds belonging to different structure types. With the recommendation engine, we predicted the expansion of the clusters and then identified the cluster/structure-type overlap. The PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type was among the clearly segregated structure types according to the unsupervised model, and a novel representative, TbIr<sub>3</sub>, was selected for experimental validation, adopting this structure. The final supervised machine learning predictions were done with partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost, confidently predicting that the novel TbIr<sub>3</sub> belongs to the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type with accuracies of 96.6, 99.8, and 99.9% respectively. Successful crystal structure segregation was attributed to a novel set of descriptors comprising both compositional and structural features. Given that the predicted PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type of the TbIr<sub>3</sub> phase could be controversial due to the extensive study of the Tb-Ir phase diagram and the reports of the TbIr<sub>3</sub> in two different structure types, we conducted two independent experimental structural validations to confirm the existence of TbIr<sub>3</sub> in the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type structure. Subsequent theoretical validation explained that Ir-Ir contacts are the primary stability factor of TbIr<sub>3</sub> in the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type structure compared to other structure types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c03510
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised Machine Learning Prediction of a Novel 1:3 Intermetallic Phase with the Synthesis of TbIr 3 (PuNi 3 -type) as Experimental Validation

Anton O. Oliynyk, Karabi Das, Partha P. Jana, Arnab Dutta et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
article

Unsupervised Machine Learning Prediction of a Novel 1:3 Intermetallic Phase with the Synthesis of TbIr 3 (PuNi 3 -type) as Experimental Validation

Anton O. Oliynyk, Karabi Das, Partha P. Jana, Arnab Dutta, Sangjoon Lee, Nishant Yadav, Sunjay Sethi, Danila Shiryaev, Emil I. Jaffal, Brian Hoang, Anirudh Machathi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Crystal structure classification of binary intermetallic structures with 1:3 stoichiometry was done with machine learning algorithms. The data set included 97 features and a total of 2366 reported compounds adopting six different structure types. An unsupervised learning method based on principal component analysis (PCA) followed by clustering using the K-means method was applied to cluster compounds belonging to different structure types. With the recommendation engine, we predicted the expansion of the clusters and then identified the cluster/structure-type overlap. The PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type was among the clearly segregated structure types according to the unsupervised model, and a novel representative, TbIr<sub>3</sub>, was selected for experimental validation, adopting this structure. The final supervised machine learning predictions were done with partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost, confidently predicting that the novel TbIr<sub>3</sub> belongs to the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type with accuracies of 96.6, 99.8, and 99.9% respectively. Successful crystal structure segregation was attributed to a novel set of descriptors comprising both compositional and structural features. Given that the predicted PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type of the TbIr<sub>3</sub> phase could be controversial due to the extensive study of the Tb-Ir phase diagram and the reports of the TbIr<sub>3</sub> in two different structure types, we conducted two independent experimental structural validations to confirm the existence of TbIr<sub>3</sub> in the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type structure. Subsequent theoretical validation explained that Ir-Ir contacts are the primary stability factor of TbIr<sub>3</sub> in the PuNi<sub>3</sub>-type structure compared to other structure types.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 147(17)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), City University of New York (US), Hunter College (US), Division of Chemistry (US), Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram (IN), Columbia University (US)
University Grants Commission, Ministry of Education, India, Research Foundation of The City University of New York, Hunter College, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.