Sentiment Analysis of Cyberbullying Using Machine Learning

Social media has become an extremely popular communication tool, especially in Indonesia, with the number of active users reaching 167 million in 2024. However, the popularity of social media also brings risks, such as cyberbullying, which has emerged as an issue with serious psychological, social, and even physical consequences for victims. Therefore, effective detection of cyberbullying is needed, one approach being the use of machine learning. While numerous studies have been conducted, further research is required to directly compare these machine learning methods to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each. This study aims to compare machine learning methods, such as SVM, KNN, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression, for detecting cyberbullying. Based on the experimental results, Naive Bayes demonstrated the best performance with an average accuracy of 91%, followed by Logistic Regression with an average accuracy of 89%. A confusion matrix and K-Fold cross-validation were also used to evaluate model performance, with Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression showing the highest consistency. Thus, it can be concluded that the probabilistic approach of Naive Bayes is more suitable for detecting cyberbullying in the dataset used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icimcis63449.2024.10957620
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment Analysis of Cyberbullying Using Machine Learning

Helena Nurramdhani Irmanda, Sri Hartati
1 citations
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
0.35
article

Sentiment Analysis of Cyberbullying Using Machine Learning

Helena Nurramdhani Irmanda, Sri Hartati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Social media has become an extremely popular communication tool, especially in Indonesia, with the number of active users reaching 167 million in 2024. However, the popularity of social media also brings risks, such as cyberbullying, which has emerged as an issue with serious psychological, social, and even physical consequences for victims. Therefore, effective detection of cyberbullying is needed, one approach being the use of machine learning. While numerous studies have been conducted, further research is required to directly compare these machine learning methods to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each. This study aims to compare machine learning methods, such as SVM, KNN, Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regression, for detecting cyberbullying. Based on the experimental results, Naive Bayes demonstrated the best performance with an average accuracy of 91%, followed by Logistic Regression with an average accuracy of 89%. A confusion matrix and K-Fold cross-validation were also used to evaluate model performance, with Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression showing the highest consistency. Thus, it can be concluded that the probabilistic approach of Naive Bayes is more suitable for detecting cyberbullying in the dataset used.

Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta (ID)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.