No One at the Wheel? Advancing Reliability and Trust for the Autonomous Driving Era

Level 4+ autonomous vehicles (AVs) can deliver unique capacities for safer roads, reduced congestion, and greater mobility if designed well with regulatory compliance. Even with the recent great progress in artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and sensor fusion technologies, public hesitation and regulatory caution persist mainly because of concerns over reliability and trust issues. This paper introduces a new TRUSTEDrive framework to deal with these challenges by combining Deep Imitation Learning (DIL), Explainable AI (XAI), and human-in-the-loop mechanisms for end-to-end autonomous navigation. Compared to traditional modular systems, TRUSTEDrive learns from the behavior of expert drivers, along with internal states, and Visio-Psycho-Physiological (VPP) information (e.g., eye-gaze movements, muscle tensions, heart rate variability, and galvanic skin response) to understand the how and why behind human decisions. In addition to this, it supports the concerned autonomous driving agent (ADA) to be human-like reactive and explainable. Moreover, TRUSTEDrive can explain its priorities online based on XAI methods to offset the black-box nature of end-to-end AI and also to help passengers and pedestrians understand its underlying logic. Finally, the approach in which trust can be continuously quantified and adjusted via user feedback cycles and context-dependent explanations is presented, which helps adapt driving styles to individual desired levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE reliability magazine
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mrl.2025.3556633
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No One at the Wheel? Advancing Reliability and Trust for the Autonomous Driving Era

Ming Hou, Arash Mohammadi, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, Tiago H. Falk et al.
1 citations
IEEE reliability magazine
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

No One at the Wheel? Advancing Reliability and Trust for the Autonomous Driving Era

Ming Hou, Arash Mohammadi, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis, Tiago H. Falk, Hamid Taghavifar, Erfan Doroudian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Level 4+ autonomous vehicles (AVs) can deliver unique capacities for safer roads, reduced congestion, and greater mobility if designed well with regulatory compliance. Even with the recent great progress in artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and sensor fusion technologies, public hesitation and regulatory caution persist mainly because of concerns over reliability and trust issues. This paper introduces a new TRUSTEDrive framework to deal with these challenges by combining Deep Imitation Learning (DIL), Explainable AI (XAI), and human-in-the-loop mechanisms for end-to-end autonomous navigation. Compared to traditional modular systems, TRUSTEDrive learns from the behavior of expert drivers, along with internal states, and Visio-Psycho-Physiological (VPP) information (e.g., eye-gaze movements, muscle tensions, heart rate variability, and galvanic skin response) to understand the how and why behind human decisions. In addition to this, it supports the concerned autonomous driving agent (ADA) to be human-like reactive and explainable. Moreover, TRUSTEDrive can explain its priorities online based on XAI methods to offset the black-box nature of end-to-end AI and also to help passengers and pedestrians understand its underlying logic. Finally, the approach in which trust can be continuously quantified and adjusted via user feedback cycles and context-dependent explanations is presented, which helps adapt driving styles to individual desired levels.

IEEE reliability magazine Vol. 2(2)
Defence Research and Development Canada (CA), Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (CA), Concordia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.