A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Climate Policy Leadership: China and the United States (1988-2024)

This research compares climate policy leadership in China and the United States (1988-2024) by analyzing policy instruments across density, intensity, and consistency dimensions. The U.S. exhibits a cyclical pattern with high variability across four administrative-driven phases, while China shows a linear accelerating trajectory across three phases. U.S. patterns align with punctuated equilibrium theory, with presidential transitions explaining most policy variance. Chinese patterns reflect strategic adaptation, with policy shifts linked to domestic priorities and international positioning. Subnational action increases during U.S. federal disengagement, while Chinese innovation clusters regionally. Our findings challenge regime-performance associations, demonstrating that different political systems offer distinct advantages for climate governance, with implications for multilevel governance design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/enpf4797
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Climate Policy Leadership: China and the United States (1988-2024)

Ci Xuan
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

A Comparative Empirical Analysis of Climate Policy Leadership: China and the United States (1988-2024)

Ci Xuan
article en

Abstract

This research compares climate policy leadership in China and the United States (1988-2024) by analyzing policy instruments across density, intensity, and consistency dimensions. The U.S. exhibits a cyclical pattern with high variability across four administrative-driven phases, while China shows a linear accelerating trajectory across three phases. U.S. patterns align with punctuated equilibrium theory, with presidential transitions explaining most policy variance. Chinese patterns reflect strategic adaptation, with policy shifts linked to domestic priorities and international positioning. Subnational action increases during U.S. federal disengagement, while Chinese innovation clusters regionally. Our findings challenge regime-performance associations, demonstrating that different political systems offer distinct advantages for climate governance, with implications for multilevel governance design.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 5(4)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.