Comparative analysis of coagulants for selective removal of iron and aluminum from galvanic wastewater: A practical and effective approach

This research aimed to evaluate three coagulants (aluminum sulfate, polyaluminum chloride, and ferric chloride) for the selective removal of iron and aluminum from wastewater generated during the pickling process in the galvanic industry. Jar tests were conducted at pH levels of 5.5 and 11, adjusted using lime. Results indicated that aluminum sulfate was the most effective coagulant, achieving a 97.91% removal of iron and a 93.09% removal of aluminum at pH 5.5 with specific dosages. The study established that optimal metal removal occurs at pH 5.5, with a necessary lime concentration of 7.5%. Statistical analyses, including MANOVA and ANOVA, confirmed significant relationships between metal removal efficiency, coagulant type, dosage, concentration, and pH. The Tukey-HSD test indicated distinct behaviors among coagulants, while the Mahalanobis Distance test highlighted specific relationships among the study variables. Overall, aluminum sulfate and polyaluminum chloride are recommended for effective wastewater treatment in the electroplating industry.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103393
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of coagulants for selective removal of iron and aluminum from galvanic wastewater: A practical and effective approach

Patrícia Reynoso Quispe, Fernando García-Ávila, Manuel Cadme-Galabay, Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzáles et al.
1 citations
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
0.82
article

Comparative analysis of coagulants for selective removal of iron and aluminum from galvanic wastewater: A practical and effective approach

Patrícia Reynoso Quispe, Fernando García-Ávila, Manuel Cadme-Galabay, Lorgio Valdiviezo-Gonzáles, Cesar Zhindón-Arévalo, Erika Mayancela-Santander, Belén Alvarado-Pacheco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate three coagulants (aluminum sulfate, polyaluminum chloride, and ferric chloride) for the selective removal of iron and aluminum from wastewater generated during the pickling process in the galvanic industry. Jar tests were conducted at pH levels of 5.5 and 11, adjusted using lime. Results indicated that aluminum sulfate was the most effective coagulant, achieving a 97.91% removal of iron and a 93.09% removal of aluminum at pH 5.5 with specific dosages. The study established that optimal metal removal occurs at pH 5.5, with a necessary lime concentration of 7.5%. Statistical analyses, including MANOVA and ANOVA, confirmed significant relationships between metal removal efficiency, coagulant type, dosage, concentration, and pH. The Tukey-HSD test indicated distinct behaviors among coagulants, while the Mahalanobis Distance test highlighted specific relationships among the study variables. Overall, aluminum sulfate and polyaluminum chloride are recommended for effective wastewater treatment in the electroplating industry.

Ain Shams Engineering JournalVol. 16(7)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of coagulants for selective removal of iron and aluminum from galvanic wastewater: A practical and effective approach — Patrícia Reynoso Quispe, Fernando García-Ávila, et al. · Ain Shams Engineering Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS