Decision support system for choosing a study program

The article explores an approach that enables a reasonable choice of a study program in an educational organization. Existing information tools used by educational institutions to support applicants are typically based on admission rules, study areas, and historical data on the average grades of previously admitted students. This paper proposes incorporating Holland test results into the decision-making process for choosing a study program and integrating this data into the decision support system's selection rules.The decision on the most suitable study program for the user is made progressively, considering the degree of confidence in its accuracy. This approach provides structured guidance to the user by: orienting them on the rules for admission to an educational organization; determining the priority study area based on broader groups of specialties and fields; identifying the most appropriate program within the chosen study field. The novelty of this approach lies in mapping the six primary psychological types identified by the Holland method to the study areas of an educational institution. Based on this comparison, a knowledge base is developed in the form of decision-making rules. The possible choices are evaluated using linguistic variables that reflect the user's confidence level in the recommendation provided by the information system. To enhance the accuracy of the decision support system, the decision-making process model is refined when forming decision-making rules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ontology of Designing
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2025-15-2-281-294
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision support system for choosing a study program

Наталья Олеговна Никулина, Elena Borisovna Startseva, Anna Malakhova
Ontology of Designing
Educational Technology and Assessment
article

Decision support system for choosing a study program

Наталья Олеговна Никулина, Elena Borisovna Startseva, Anna Malakhova
article en

Abstract

The article explores an approach that enables a reasonable choice of a study program in an educational organization. Existing information tools used by educational institutions to support applicants are typically based on admission rules, study areas, and historical data on the average grades of previously admitted students. This paper proposes incorporating Holland test results into the decision-making process for choosing a study program and integrating this data into the decision support system's selection rules.The decision on the most suitable study program for the user is made progressively, considering the degree of confidence in its accuracy. This approach provides structured guidance to the user by: orienting them on the rules for admission to an educational organization; determining the priority study area based on broader groups of specialties and fields; identifying the most appropriate program within the chosen study field. The novelty of this approach lies in mapping the six primary psychological types identified by the Holland method to the study areas of an educational institution. Based on this comparison, a knowledge base is developed in the form of decision-making rules. The possible choices are evaluated using linguistic variables that reflect the user's confidence level in the recommendation provided by the information system. To enhance the accuracy of the decision support system, the decision-making process model is refined when forming decision-making rules.

Ontology of DesigningVol. 15(2)
University of Science and Technology (YE), MIREA - Russian Technological University (RU), Korea University of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Educational Technology and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.