Overeducation and fertility decisions

Purpose Extensive research highlights the substantial impact of overeducation on labor market outcomes. However, few studies explore its effects beyond the labor market. This paper examines whether and how overeducation influences fertility. Design/methodology/approach First, we propose two theoretical hypotheses based on existing literature and develop an overlapping generations model incorporating overeducation and educational attainment, with conclusions aligning with the hypotheses. Second, using data from the China Family Panel Studies, we empirically test the impact of overeducation on fertility and its underlying mechanisms. This paper employs the Heckman correction model and IV method and conducts subsample analyses to confirm the findings. Findings Overeducated individuals exhibit significantly lower fertility, primarily mediated by reduced income and increased work time. Notably, the negative effect of overeducation on fertility is more pronounced among highly educated groups. Practical implications Addressing overeducation could mitigate the adverse impact of overall improvement in national education levels on fertility. Policies aimed at improving employment quality for highly educated groups may indirectly support fertility. Originality/value As one of the few studies linking overeducation to non-labor market outcomes, we provide evidence of its negative causal effect on fertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Manpower
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-02-2024-0083
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overeducation and fertility decisions

Jinzhen Ye, H. Bill Xie, Hongwei Huang
International Journal of Manpower
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Overeducation and fertility decisions

Jinzhen Ye, H. Bill Xie, Hongwei Huang
article en

Abstract

Purpose Extensive research highlights the substantial impact of overeducation on labor market outcomes. However, few studies explore its effects beyond the labor market. This paper examines whether and how overeducation influences fertility. Design/methodology/approach First, we propose two theoretical hypotheses based on existing literature and develop an overlapping generations model incorporating overeducation and educational attainment, with conclusions aligning with the hypotheses. Second, using data from the China Family Panel Studies, we empirically test the impact of overeducation on fertility and its underlying mechanisms. This paper employs the Heckman correction model and IV method and conducts subsample analyses to confirm the findings. Findings Overeducated individuals exhibit significantly lower fertility, primarily mediated by reduced income and increased work time. Notably, the negative effect of overeducation on fertility is more pronounced among highly educated groups. Practical implications Addressing overeducation could mitigate the adverse impact of overall improvement in national education levels on fertility. Policies aimed at improving employment quality for highly educated groups may indirectly support fertility. Originality/value As one of the few studies linking overeducation to non-labor market outcomes, we provide evidence of its negative causal effect on fertility.

International Journal of ManpowerVol. 46(7)
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.