How the dispersion and coalescence behaviors of CO2 bubbles affecting carbonation reaction in bubble column reactor: experimental and numerical simulation study

• Distinct CO 2 coalescence (h/d=3.15) versus optimal dispersion regime (h/d=4-5). • Axial CO 2 /H 2 CO 3 concentration gradients revealed via experiment-simulation synergy. • Intense stirring alters bubble trajectory from vertical ascent to radial dispersion. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) mineralization via carbide slag (an alkaline industrial solid waste mainly composed of Ca(OH) 2 , with a D 90 of 146.877 μm) presents a promising strategy for CO 2 capture and utilization. However, achieving precise control over CO 2 bubble behavior in bubble column reactors (BCR), particularly regarding bubble distribution, coalescence patterns, and spatial uniformity, remains a critical challenge for process optimization. This study elucidates how operational parameters influence CO 2 bubble behavior and subsequent carbonation efficiency through systematic experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Our findings reveal distinct effects of operational parameters on bubble behavior: the height-to-diameter ratio (h/d) determines bubble spatial distribution patterns, with an optimal range of 4.00–5.00 achieving uniform bubble dispersion. Higher stirring rates (above 600 r/min) enhance bubble breakup and improve spatial distribution, leading to increased carbonation efficiency. Gas flow rate (200–300 mL/min) affects bubble number and distribution density, while gas distributor orifice dimensions (15–30 μm) influence initial bubble size and dispersion patterns. Under these parameter ranges, the carbonation efficiency can reach up to 81.88 %, with a CO 2 fixation efficiency of 51.26 %. Through high-speed imaging analysis coupled with numerical simulation, we elucidate bubble behavior evolution and identify distinct patterns of CO 2 and H 2 CO 3 concentration gradients along the reactor axis. The developed parameter optimization framework demonstrates that enhanced stirring rates can improve bubble breakup and spatial distribution, effectively compensating for suboptimal conditions of other parameters, providing fundamental insights into parameter-mediated bubble behavior control in BCR carbonation and establishing a theoretical foundation for industrial-scale implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.162675
Citations
5
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the dispersion and coalescence behaviors of CO2 bubbles affecting carbonation reaction in bubble column reactor: experimental and numerical simulation study

Zihe Pan, Jintao Ma, Ran Peng, Lin Chen et al.
5 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.00
article

How the dispersion and coalescence behaviors of CO2 bubbles affecting carbonation reaction in bubble column reactor: experimental and numerical simulation study

Zihe Pan, Jintao Ma, Ran Peng, Lin Chen, Cheng Chen, Enze Li, Yanxia Guo, Xin Wang, Yonghong Qin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Distinct CO 2 coalescence (h/d=3.15) versus optimal dispersion regime (h/d=4-5). • Axial CO 2 /H 2 CO 3 concentration gradients revealed via experiment-simulation synergy. • Intense stirring alters bubble trajectory from vertical ascent to radial dispersion. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) mineralization via carbide slag (an alkaline industrial solid waste mainly composed of Ca(OH) 2 , with a D 90 of 146.877 μm) presents a promising strategy for CO 2 capture and utilization. However, achieving precise control over CO 2 bubble behavior in bubble column reactors (BCR), particularly regarding bubble distribution, coalescence patterns, and spatial uniformity, remains a critical challenge for process optimization. This study elucidates how operational parameters influence CO 2 bubble behavior and subsequent carbonation efficiency through systematic experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Our findings reveal distinct effects of operational parameters on bubble behavior: the height-to-diameter ratio (h/d) determines bubble spatial distribution patterns, with an optimal range of 4.00–5.00 achieving uniform bubble dispersion. Higher stirring rates (above 600 r/min) enhance bubble breakup and improve spatial distribution, leading to increased carbonation efficiency. Gas flow rate (200–300 mL/min) affects bubble number and distribution density, while gas distributor orifice dimensions (15–30 μm) influence initial bubble size and dispersion patterns. Under these parameter ranges, the carbonation efficiency can reach up to 81.88 %, with a CO 2 fixation efficiency of 51.26 %. Through high-speed imaging analysis coupled with numerical simulation, we elucidate bubble behavior evolution and identify distinct patterns of CO 2 and H 2 CO 3 concentration gradients along the reactor axis. The developed parameter optimization framework demonstrates that enhanced stirring rates can improve bubble breakup and spatial distribution, effectively compensating for suboptimal conditions of other parameters, providing fundamental insights into parameter-mediated bubble behavior control in BCR carbonation and establishing a theoretical foundation for industrial-scale implementation.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 512
Shanxi University (CN), Dalian Maritime University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.