Color and Translucency Compatibility Among Various Resin-Based Composites and Layering Strategies

(1) <b>Background:</b> Natural-looking dental restorations require careful selection of the restorative material, with color and translucency characteristics similar to the natural dental structures. (2) <b>Objectives:</b> This research aimed to evaluate if there is compatibility regarding the color and translucency between different commercial RBCs in different layering recipes. (3) <b>Methods</b>: Sixty 1 mm thick disk specimens were produced from three different RBCs: ESS (Essentia-GC), BEG (Brilliant Ever Glow-Coltene), and IPS (IPS Empress Direct-Ivoclar Vivadent). Three different opacities and translucencies (enamel, dentin, and opaque shades) from each system were used in four recipes (R1-enamel, R2-dentin, R3-enamel and dentin, R4-enamel, dentin, and opaque) to obtain single-, double-, and triple-layered samples, respecting the anatomical layering technique. CIE L*, a*, b*, C*, h<sup>0</sup> coordinates were recorded, and the relative translucency parameter (RTP<sub>00</sub>) was calculated. Further, the color differences (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) and the difference in translucencies ΔRTP<sub>00</sub> were analyzed between the materials and between the layered recipes. (4) <b>Results</b>: The CIE L* and h° color coordinates and RTP<sub>00</sub> showed significant differences among all three RBCs for all four recipes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for each recipe was R1: ESS > BEG > IPS, R2 and R3: BEG > IPS > ESS, R4: BEG > ESS > IPS. Important differences were found in color and translucency among the recipes for each of the three RBCs tested (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for the tested RBCs was ESS: R1 > R3 > R4 > R2, BEG and IPS: R1 > R3 > R2 > R4. (5) <b>Conclusions:</b> No significant compatibility was observed in color and translucency among different layering recipes of the same composite materials nor between similar layering recipes when using different composites. The color differences between materials were more significant than the differences in translucency for each recipe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13040173
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Color and Translucency Compatibility Among Various Resin-Based Composites and Layering Strategies

Alexandra Iulia Aghiorghiesei, Diana Dudea, Cristina Gáspárik, Javier Ruiz‐López et al.
3 citations
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
5.03
article

Color and Translucency Compatibility Among Various Resin-Based Composites and Layering Strategies

Alexandra Iulia Aghiorghiesei, Diana Dudea, Cristina Gáspárik, Javier Ruiz‐López, Bogdan Culic, Elena Bianca Varvară
article en
3 citations

Abstract

(1) <b>Background:</b> Natural-looking dental restorations require careful selection of the restorative material, with color and translucency characteristics similar to the natural dental structures. (2) <b>Objectives:</b> This research aimed to evaluate if there is compatibility regarding the color and translucency between different commercial RBCs in different layering recipes. (3) <b>Methods</b>: Sixty 1 mm thick disk specimens were produced from three different RBCs: ESS (Essentia-GC), BEG (Brilliant Ever Glow-Coltene), and IPS (IPS Empress Direct-Ivoclar Vivadent). Three different opacities and translucencies (enamel, dentin, and opaque shades) from each system were used in four recipes (R1-enamel, R2-dentin, R3-enamel and dentin, R4-enamel, dentin, and opaque) to obtain single-, double-, and triple-layered samples, respecting the anatomical layering technique. CIE L*, a*, b*, C*, h<sup>0</sup> coordinates were recorded, and the relative translucency parameter (RTP<sub>00</sub>) was calculated. Further, the color differences (ΔE<sub>00</sub>) and the difference in translucencies ΔRTP<sub>00</sub> were analyzed between the materials and between the layered recipes. (4) <b>Results</b>: The CIE L* and h° color coordinates and RTP<sub>00</sub> showed significant differences among all three RBCs for all four recipes (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for each recipe was R1: ESS > BEG > IPS, R2 and R3: BEG > IPS > ESS, R4: BEG > ESS > IPS. Important differences were found in color and translucency among the recipes for each of the three RBCs tested (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for the tested RBCs was ESS: R1 > R3 > R4 > R2, BEG and IPS: R1 > R3 > R2 > R4. (5) <b>Conclusions:</b> No significant compatibility was observed in color and translucency among different layering recipes of the same composite materials nor between similar layering recipes when using different composites. The color differences between materials were more significant than the differences in translucency for each recipe.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(4)
Universidad de Granada (ES), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental materials and restorations
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.