Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a study with deep learning and traditional machine learning

'Brain age' is a numerical estimate of the biological age of the brain and an overall effort to measure neurodegeneration, regardless of disease type. In multiple sclerosis, accelerated brain ageing has been linked to disability accrual. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool for the assessment and quantification of the impact of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the existence of numerous AI models, there is a noticeable lack of comparative imaging data for traditional machine learning versus deep learning in conditions such as multiple sclerosis. A retrospective observational study was initiated to analyse clinical and MRI data (4584 MRIs) from various scanners in a large longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1516) of people with multiple sclerosis collected from two institutions (Karolinska Institute and Oslo University Hospital) using a uniform data post-processing pipeline. We conducted a comparative assessment of brain age using a deep learning simple fully convolutional network and a well-established traditional machine learning model. This study was primarily aimed to validate the deep learning brain age model in multiple sclerosis. The correlation between estimated brain age and chronological age was stronger for the deep learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the traditional machine learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). An increase in brain age was significantly associated with higher expanded disability status scale scores (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 3.7, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and longer disease duration (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 6.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 5.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant inter-model difference in clinical correlation or effect measure was found, but significant differences for traditional machine learning-derived brain age estimates were found between several scanners. Our study suggests that the deep learning-derived brain age is significantly associated with clinical disability, performed equally well to the traditional machine learning-derived brain age measures, and may counteract scanner variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Communications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf152
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a study with deep learning and traditional machine learning

Einar August Høgestøl, Lars Tjelta Westlye, J‐Sebastian Muehlboeck, Leszek Stawiarz et al.
5 citations
Brain Communications
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
7.36
article

Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a study with deep learning and traditional machine learning

Einar August Høgestøl, Lars Tjelta Westlye, J‐Sebastian Muehlboeck, Leszek Stawiarz, Tomas Olsson, Benjamin Victor Ineichen, Daniel Ferreira, Gro Owren Nygaard, Tobias Granberg, Lars Skattebøl, Thomas Moridi, Russell Ouellette, Hanne F. Harbo, Ingrid Skelton Kockum, Fredrik Piehl, Eric Westman, Piotr Sowa, Elisabeth Gulowsen Celius, Ali Manouchehrinia, Mona K. Beyer, Tobias Kaufmann, Esten H. Leonardsen, Jan Hillert
article en
5 citations

Abstract

'Brain age' is a numerical estimate of the biological age of the brain and an overall effort to measure neurodegeneration, regardless of disease type. In multiple sclerosis, accelerated brain ageing has been linked to disability accrual. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool for the assessment and quantification of the impact of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the existence of numerous AI models, there is a noticeable lack of comparative imaging data for traditional machine learning versus deep learning in conditions such as multiple sclerosis. A retrospective observational study was initiated to analyse clinical and MRI data (4584 MRIs) from various scanners in a large longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1516) of people with multiple sclerosis collected from two institutions (Karolinska Institute and Oslo University Hospital) using a uniform data post-processing pipeline. We conducted a comparative assessment of brain age using a deep learning simple fully convolutional network and a well-established traditional machine learning model. This study was primarily aimed to validate the deep learning brain age model in multiple sclerosis. The correlation between estimated brain age and chronological age was stronger for the deep learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the traditional machine learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). An increase in brain age was significantly associated with higher expanded disability status scale scores (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 3.7, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and longer disease duration (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 6.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 5.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant inter-model difference in clinical correlation or effect measure was found, but significant differences for traditional machine learning-derived brain age estimates were found between several scanners. Our study suggests that the deep learning-derived brain age is significantly associated with clinical disability, performed equally well to the traditional machine learning-derived brain age measures, and may counteract scanner variability.

Brain CommunicationsVol. 7(3)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm Health Care Services (SE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Norges Forskningsråd, European Research Council, Helse Sør-Øst RHF, Center for Innovative Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
7.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.