Privacy and Digital Health: Causes for Concern and a Way Forward

Digital health technologies hold promise for addressing substance use disorder (SUD) treatment gaps but also introduce significant privacy risks, challenging patient autonomy and therapeutic trust. This commentary highlights how SUD digital health services, despite claims of "privacy" and "HIPAA compliance," often utilize surveillance technologies that enable widespread data sharing, including sensitive health information and location data, with third parties, often without informed consent. This is particularly concerning as individuals seeking addiction treatment share highly sensitive data that, once outside the controlled medical and research setting, can lead to discrimination, legal risks, and algorithmic profiling. Drawing on evidence of deceptive practices by digital health companies and a lack of oversight, this commentary argues that current approaches prioritize surveillance capitalism over data protection. This model increases vulnerabilities that disproportionately impact marginalized populations. We must reimagine digital health approaches for SUD treatment by rejecting the surveillance-driven status quo. Implementing a "privacy by design" framework is crucial, alongside robust accountability mechanisms and professional guidance. Effective digital health solutions for SUD must be rooted in ethical standards that prioritize patient dignity, autonomy, and privacy as foundational principles, ensuring that technological innovation aligns with established medical and research ethics. Ultimately, the goal is to leverage digital health's potential while safeguarding the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals seeking SUD treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000001496
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy and Digital Health: Causes for Concern and a Way Forward

Mishka Terplan, Jonathan J.K. Stoltman
3 citations
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
8.29
article

Privacy and Digital Health: Causes for Concern and a Way Forward

Mishka Terplan, Jonathan J.K. Stoltman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Digital health technologies hold promise for addressing substance use disorder (SUD) treatment gaps but also introduce significant privacy risks, challenging patient autonomy and therapeutic trust. This commentary highlights how SUD digital health services, despite claims of "privacy" and "HIPAA compliance," often utilize surveillance technologies that enable widespread data sharing, including sensitive health information and location data, with third parties, often without informed consent. This is particularly concerning as individuals seeking addiction treatment share highly sensitive data that, once outside the controlled medical and research setting, can lead to discrimination, legal risks, and algorithmic profiling. Drawing on evidence of deceptive practices by digital health companies and a lack of oversight, this commentary argues that current approaches prioritize surveillance capitalism over data protection. This model increases vulnerabilities that disproportionately impact marginalized populations. We must reimagine digital health approaches for SUD treatment by rejecting the surveillance-driven status quo. Implementing a "privacy by design" framework is crucial, alongside robust accountability mechanisms and professional guidance. Effective digital health solutions for SUD must be rooted in ethical standards that prioritize patient dignity, autonomy, and privacy as foundational principles, ensuring that technological innovation aligns with established medical and research ethics. Ultimately, the goal is to leverage digital health's potential while safeguarding the rights and well-being of vulnerable individuals seeking SUD treatment.

Journal of Addiction MedicineVol. 19(4)
Grand Rapids Community College (US), Kuyper College (US), Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan (US), Friends Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.