Sounds of the deep: How input representation, model choice, and dataset size influence underwater sound classification performance

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have proven highly effective in automatically identifying and classifying underwater sound sources, enabling efficient analysis of marine environments. This work examines two key design choices for a CNN classifier: input representation and network architecture, analyzing their importance as training data size varies and their effectiveness in generalizing between sites. Passive acoustic data from three offshore sites in Western Scotland were used for hierarchical classification; categorizing sounds into one of four classes: delphinid tonal, delphinid clicks, vessels, and ambient noise. Three different input representations of the acoustic signals were investigated along with four CNN architectures, including three pre-trained for image classification tasks. Experiments show that a custom-built shallow CNN can outperform more complex ar chitectures if the input representation is chosen appropriately. For example, a shallow CNN using Mel-spectrogram normalised with per channel energy normalization (MS-PCEN) achieved a 12.5% accuracy improvement over a ResNet model when small amounts of training data are available. Studying model performance across the three sites demonstrates that input representation is an important factor for achieving robust results between sites, with MS-PCEN achieving the best performance. However, the importance of the choice of input representation decreases as the training dataset size increases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036498
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.38
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sounds of the deep: How input representation, model choice, and dataset size influence underwater sound classification performance

Jonathan M. Bull, Denise Risch, Ellen L. White, Paul R. White et al.
3 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Underwater Acoustics Research
5.38
article

Sounds of the deep: How input representation, model choice, and dataset size influence underwater sound classification performance

Jonathan M. Bull, Denise Risch, Ellen L. White, Paul R. White, Benedict Dell, Abdullah Olcay
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have proven highly effective in automatically identifying and classifying underwater sound sources, enabling efficient analysis of marine environments. This work examines two key design choices for a CNN classifier: input representation and network architecture, analyzing their importance as training data size varies and their effectiveness in generalizing between sites. Passive acoustic data from three offshore sites in Western Scotland were used for hierarchical classification; categorizing sounds into one of four classes: delphinid tonal, delphinid clicks, vessels, and ambient noise. Three different input representations of the acoustic signals were investigated along with four CNN architectures, including three pre-trained for image classification tasks. Experiments show that a custom-built shallow CNN can outperform more complex ar chitectures if the input representation is chosen appropriately. For example, a shallow CNN using Mel-spectrogram normalised with per channel energy normalization (MS-PCEN) achieved a 12.5% accuracy improvement over a ResNet model when small amounts of training data are available. Studying model performance across the three sites demonstrates that input representation is an important factor for achieving robust results between sites, with MS-PCEN achieving the best performance. However, the importance of the choice of input representation decreases as the training dataset size increases.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(4)
University of Southampton (GB), Scottish Association For Marine Science (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Underwater Acoustics Research
5.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.