Authority without Accountability: The Search for Justice in Pakistan

This article examines Pakistan’s counter-terrorism laws, focusing on the Actions in Aid of Civil Power Regulation (AACPR), particularly regarding military accountability. As the involvement of FATA and PATA communities in terrorism increased, the military was granted powers to arrest individuals and detain them without trial. A key issue is the indemnity clause in the AACPR, which exempts military personnel from prosecution if actions are taken in "good faith." This provision raises concerns about accountability and the potential for human rights abuses. The article critiques this clause, analyzing its constitutional and international human rights implications. By reviewing case laws and international treaties, it explores how Pakistan’s counter-terrorism laws fail to meet global human rights standards. The article advocates for reforming these laws to ensure better accountability while balancing national security with respect for human rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Political Review
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31703/gpr.2025(x-i).06
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authority without Accountability: The Search for Justice in Pakistan

Mehnaz Begum, Maryam Shahid, Aijaz Ahmed Khan
3 citations
Global Political Review
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Authority without Accountability: The Search for Justice in Pakistan

Mehnaz Begum, Maryam Shahid, Aijaz Ahmed Khan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article examines Pakistan’s counter-terrorism laws, focusing on the Actions in Aid of Civil Power Regulation (AACPR), particularly regarding military accountability. As the involvement of FATA and PATA communities in terrorism increased, the military was granted powers to arrest individuals and detain them without trial. A key issue is the indemnity clause in the AACPR, which exempts military personnel from prosecution if actions are taken in "good faith." This provision raises concerns about accountability and the potential for human rights abuses. The article critiques this clause, analyzing its constitutional and international human rights implications. By reviewing case laws and international treaties, it explores how Pakistan’s counter-terrorism laws fail to meet global human rights standards. The article advocates for reforming these laws to ensure better accountability while balancing national security with respect for human rights.

Global Political ReviewVol. X(I)
International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK), Islamia College University (PK), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar (PK), University of Peshawar (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.