The downstream risk of multiple revisions following a prior TKA revision due to infection is higher compared to an aseptic TKA revision: A nationwide register study
Authors
Robin Christensen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-0631)
Julius Tetens Hald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-2946)
Anders El‐Galaly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8093-8266)
Martin Lindberg‐Larsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-677X)
Anders Odgaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4841-518X)
Michael Mørk Petersen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-6420)
The downstream risk of multiple revisions following a prior TKA revision due to infection is higher compared to an aseptic TKA revision: A nationwide register study
Robin Christensen, Julius Tetens Hald, Anders El‐Galaly, Martin Lindberg‐Larsen et al.
Citations
2 citations
Journal
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Topics
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)
4.01
article
The downstream risk of multiple revisions following a prior TKA revision due to infection is higher compared to an aseptic TKA revision: A nationwide register study
Robin Christensen, Julius Tetens Hald, Anders El‐Galaly, Martin Lindberg‐Larsen, Anders Odgaard, Michael Mørk Petersen
article en
2 citations
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
Journal of Experimental OrthopaedicsVol. 12(2)
Institutions
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Cochrane (DK)