Analysis of Training and Validation Loss in Deep Learning Models

A study examines deep learning methodologies which use Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to recognize chess pieces because these pieces form the basis for automated chess platforms and solutions. The training database consisted of Bishop, King, Knight, Pawn, Queen, and Rook chess pieces. The network established its foundation through a VGG19 architectural design which received reinforcement from data augmentation to boost model generalization capabilities. The strategy for training involved running base model procedures followed by more precise fine-tuned approaches to improve precision levels. The base model attained 92.5% accuracy in training but validation phase accuracy measured at 88.3%. Although the fine-tuned model reached perfect training accuracy its validation accuracy remained at 80% thus requiring additional enhancements for better performance. The confusion matrix provided straightforward classification outcomes because it showed that only certain categories experienced minor classification mistakes thus proving the model worked efficiently. All classes benefited from superior performance according to the precision and recall and F1-score results but Knight and Rook classes in particular received outstanding results. The F1-score for Queen class was lower than other pieces because recall numbers surpassed precision values. The research shows that CNN can detect chess pieces yet further improvements need to happen for better identification accuracy within diverse chess objects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2025.904007
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Training and Validation Loss in Deep Learning Models

Israa Nasir Abood, Amina Khaled Khaleel, Ma Rwah Adalkareem Radhi
International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

Analysis of Training and Validation Loss in Deep Learning Models

Israa Nasir Abood, Amina Khaled Khaleel, Ma Rwah Adalkareem Radhi
article en

Abstract

A study examines deep learning methodologies which use Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to recognize chess pieces because these pieces form the basis for automated chess platforms and solutions. The training database consisted of Bishop, King, Knight, Pawn, Queen, and Rook chess pieces. The network established its foundation through a VGG19 architectural design which received reinforcement from data augmentation to boost model generalization capabilities. The strategy for training involved running base model procedures followed by more precise fine-tuned approaches to improve precision levels. The base model attained 92.5% accuracy in training but validation phase accuracy measured at 88.3%. Although the fine-tuned model reached perfect training accuracy its validation accuracy remained at 80% thus requiring additional enhancements for better performance. The confusion matrix provided straightforward classification outcomes because it showed that only certain categories experienced minor classification mistakes thus proving the model worked efficiently. All classes benefited from superior performance according to the precision and recall and F1-score results but Knight and Rook classes in particular received outstanding results. The F1-score for Queen class was lower than other pieces because recall numbers surpassed precision values. The research shows that CNN can detect chess pieces yet further improvements need to happen for better identification accuracy within diverse chess objects.

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and TechnologyVol. 09(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.