Reliability Estimation of Stress–Strength Model for Multi-Component System Based on Lomax Distribution Using the Survival Signature

In this paper, the stress–strength reliability of complex systems with diverse component types is investigated based on the theoretical framework of survival signatures. Assuming that both the strength and stress of components of the same type follow the Lomax distribution, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), maximum spacing estimation (MSPE), and Bayesian estimation for the stress–strength model are derived under the condition that components of the same type have common scale parameters. Subsequently, the 95% Bootstrap-p and Highest Posterior Density confidence intervals for the stress–strength reliability were derived using Monte Carlo simulation. Additionally, since stress cycles are represented by a Poisson process, a dynamic stress–strength model for the system subjected to periodic stresses over the interval (0,t] was developed, together with an approximate computational algorithm for this model. Finally, a simulation experiment was conducted using a system consisting of a total of nine components of three different types to analyze these estimation methods. The findings reveal that MLE exhibits the lowest estimation error, registering merely 0.001 in the case of small-sized samples. Compared with the previous two methods, Bayesian estimation has a relatively larger error. However, in the case of large samples, the error is 0.0112. In addition, the performance and accuracy of the dynamic model were verified through the proposed algorithm. The results indicate that compared with the static model at t=0, the error of the algorithm is 0.0464. Overall, the model evaluation results are satisfactory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17040614
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability Estimation of Stress–Strength Model for Multi-Component System Based on Lomax Distribution Using the Survival Signature

Tian Guo, Xiaogang Liu, Jiaojiao Guo, Jianhui Li et al.
1 citations
Symmetry
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
2.63
article

Reliability Estimation of Stress–Strength Model for Multi-Component System Based on Lomax Distribution Using the Survival Signature

Tian Guo, Xiaogang Liu, Jiaojiao Guo, Jianhui Li, Jialin Su
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, the stress–strength reliability of complex systems with diverse component types is investigated based on the theoretical framework of survival signatures. Assuming that both the strength and stress of components of the same type follow the Lomax distribution, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), maximum spacing estimation (MSPE), and Bayesian estimation for the stress–strength model are derived under the condition that components of the same type have common scale parameters. Subsequently, the 95% Bootstrap-p and Highest Posterior Density confidence intervals for the stress–strength reliability were derived using Monte Carlo simulation. Additionally, since stress cycles are represented by a Poisson process, a dynamic stress–strength model for the system subjected to periodic stresses over the interval (0,t] was developed, together with an approximate computational algorithm for this model. Finally, a simulation experiment was conducted using a system consisting of a total of nine components of three different types to analyze these estimation methods. The findings reveal that MLE exhibits the lowest estimation error, registering merely 0.001 in the case of small-sized samples. Compared with the previous two methods, Bayesian estimation has a relatively larger error. However, in the case of large samples, the error is 0.0112. In addition, the performance and accuracy of the dynamic model were verified through the proposed algorithm. The results indicate that compared with the static model at t=0, the error of the algorithm is 0.0464. Overall, the model evaluation results are satisfactory.

SymmetryVol. 17(4)
Northwest University (CN), Xijing University (CN)
Xijing University, Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.