Optimizing Dense Medium Separation Pre-Concentration by Comparative Evaluation of High-Pressure Grinding Rolls vs. Conventional Crushing

This paper investigated pre-concentration of a low-grade Upper Group 2 (UG2) ore to assess the possibility of rejecting waste at a typical discard Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) grade of <0.4 g/t at mass rejection to floats greater than 16% by comparing feed prepared by High pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) to Conventional crushers (Cone crushers). Heavy Liquid Separation (HLS) was conducted as a benchmark test to Dense Medium Separation (DMS) to determine the expected grade, recovery, and mass yield for various size classes and crusher. The comparison between fine size classes −9.5 + 1.18 mm and −6.7 + 1.18 mm crushed by HPGR and conventional crushing showed that, under the conditions tested, the conventional crusher outperformed HPGR in terms of high sinks grade and a higher percentage of material exposed to pre-concentration. Looking at coarser size fractions (+12 mm), HLS results showed that under the conditions tested, size fraction −20 + 1.18 mm crushed by a conventional crusher at an optimum density of 3.4 g/cm3 is an optimized size fraction to run the DMS plant. The pilot DMS cyclone testwork showed that 61.1% by mass could be rejected to the floats stream based on Run of Mine (ROM) feed at 1.12% Cr2O3 and 0.42 g/t Total PGMs + Au grade, a typical discardable PGMs grade.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min15040422
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Dense Medium Separation Pre-Concentration by Comparative Evaluation of High-Pressure Grinding Rolls vs. Conventional Crushing

Getrude Marape, Tebogo Mokgomola, Rabelani Mariba
Minerals
Mineral Processing and Grinding
article

Optimizing Dense Medium Separation Pre-Concentration by Comparative Evaluation of High-Pressure Grinding Rolls vs. Conventional Crushing

Getrude Marape, Tebogo Mokgomola, Rabelani Mariba
article en

Abstract

This paper investigated pre-concentration of a low-grade Upper Group 2 (UG2) ore to assess the possibility of rejecting waste at a typical discard Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) grade of <0.4 g/t at mass rejection to floats greater than 16% by comparing feed prepared by High pressure grinding rolls (HPGR) to Conventional crushers (Cone crushers). Heavy Liquid Separation (HLS) was conducted as a benchmark test to Dense Medium Separation (DMS) to determine the expected grade, recovery, and mass yield for various size classes and crusher. The comparison between fine size classes −9.5 + 1.18 mm and −6.7 + 1.18 mm crushed by HPGR and conventional crushing showed that, under the conditions tested, the conventional crusher outperformed HPGR in terms of high sinks grade and a higher percentage of material exposed to pre-concentration. Looking at coarser size fractions (+12 mm), HLS results showed that under the conditions tested, size fraction −20 + 1.18 mm crushed by a conventional crusher at an optimum density of 3.4 g/cm3 is an optimized size fraction to run the DMS plant. The pilot DMS cyclone testwork showed that 61.1% by mass could be rejected to the floats stream based on Run of Mine (ROM) feed at 1.12% Cr2O3 and 0.42 g/t Total PGMs + Au grade, a typical discardable PGMs grade.

MineralsVol. 15(4)
Mintek (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.