In Between The Lines Of River Contracts: Analysing a water governance tool through the lens of the Rooted Water Collectives framework

The article, based on action-research, analyses the water management tool known as a ‘River Contract’ (RC) — as conceptualised and implemented in Italy — through a lens of political ecology. The objective is to understand whether, and under what conditions, RCs can be conceived as an example of societal response and as a potential form of ‘river defense movement’ for the care of water bodies, rather than as a mainstream participatory water management tool. The Rooted Water Collectives’ (RWCs’) analytical framework (Vos et al., 2020) is applied to investigate the case of RCs implemented in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Northeast Italy). The framework allows for a clearer examination of the inconsistencies between what RCs should be, considering the official principles and guidelines, and what they are in their reality, identifying some ‘gray zones’ in their implementation, their criticalities and weaknesses, as well as their potentialities. Furthermore, the article suggests some possible improvements and aspects that could be integrated into the RWC framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shima
Published
2025-04-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21463/shima.242
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Between The Lines Of River Contracts: Analysing a water governance tool through the lens of the Rooted Water Collectives framework

Anna Brusarosco
Shima
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

In Between The Lines Of River Contracts: Analysing a water governance tool through the lens of the Rooted Water Collectives framework

Anna Brusarosco
article en

Abstract

The article, based on action-research, analyses the water management tool known as a ‘River Contract’ (RC) — as conceptualised and implemented in Italy — through a lens of political ecology. The objective is to understand whether, and under what conditions, RCs can be conceived as an example of societal response and as a potential form of ‘river defense movement’ for the care of water bodies, rather than as a mainstream participatory water management tool. The Rooted Water Collectives’ (RWCs’) analytical framework (Vos et al., 2020) is applied to investigate the case of RCs implemented in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Northeast Italy). The framework allows for a clearer examination of the inconsistencies between what RCs should be, considering the official principles and guidelines, and what they are in their reality, identifying some ‘gray zones’ in their implementation, their criticalities and weaknesses, as well as their potentialities. Furthermore, the article suggests some possible improvements and aspects that could be integrated into the RWC framework.

ShimaVol. 19(1)
University of Udine (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In Between The Lines Of River Contracts: Analysing a water governance tool through the lens of the Rooted Water Collectives framework — Anna Brusarosco · Shima (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS