Comparison of different 3D reconstruction software tools in preoperative modeling for cranio-maxillofacial surgery

Aim: This study evaluates the application of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology in cranio-maxillofacial surgery, focusing on its ability to provide accurate anatomical data and essential support for preoperative planning. Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted using three commonly utilized 3D reconstruction software programs: 3D Slicer, ProPlan CMF, and Mimics. Each was assessed based on modeling accuracy, operational efficiency, and functional specialization. Data were collected and analyzed to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each software in different surgical contexts. Results: The findings demonstrate that all three software programs provide consistent modeling accuracy. However, significant differences were observed in terms of operational efficiency and functional specialization, which influence their applicability in various scenarios. Specifically, 3D Slicer excels in flexibility, ProPlan CMF in cranio-maxillofacial applications, and Mimics in precision and comprehensive functionality. Conclusion: 3D reconstruction technology has significant potential for optimizing preoperative planning in plastic surgery, especially in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. This study offers critical insights into the selection and optimization of 3D reconstruction software, paving the way for more effective and tailored surgical planning. Future research may focus on integrating AI-driven tools to enhance operational efficiency and broaden the application scope of 3D reconstruction in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic and Aesthetic Research
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2025.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of different 3D reconstruction software tools in preoperative modeling for cranio-maxillofacial surgery

W.-C. Li, Liao Junlin, Chen Yan, Zhengyang Li et al.
1 citations
Plastic and Aesthetic Research
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
article

Comparison of different 3D reconstruction software tools in preoperative modeling for cranio-maxillofacial surgery

W.-C. Li, Liao Junlin, Chen Yan, Zhengyang Li, Yangchen Wei, C Huang, Tianyu Xiong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluates the application of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technology in cranio-maxillofacial surgery, focusing on its ability to provide accurate anatomical data and essential support for preoperative planning. Methods: A comparative analysis was conducted using three commonly utilized 3D reconstruction software programs: 3D Slicer, ProPlan CMF, and Mimics. Each was assessed based on modeling accuracy, operational efficiency, and functional specialization. Data were collected and analyzed to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each software in different surgical contexts. Results: The findings demonstrate that all three software programs provide consistent modeling accuracy. However, significant differences were observed in terms of operational efficiency and functional specialization, which influence their applicability in various scenarios. Specifically, 3D Slicer excels in flexibility, ProPlan CMF in cranio-maxillofacial applications, and Mimics in precision and comprehensive functionality. Conclusion: 3D reconstruction technology has significant potential for optimizing preoperative planning in plastic surgery, especially in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. This study offers critical insights into the selection and optimization of 3D reconstruction software, paving the way for more effective and tailored surgical planning. Future research may focus on integrating AI-driven tools to enhance operational efficiency and broaden the application scope of 3D reconstruction in cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Plastic and Aesthetic Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of different 3D reconstruction software tools in preoperative modeling for cranio-maxillofacial surgery — W.-C. Li, Liao Junlin, et al. · Plastic and Aesthetic Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS