Description and comparison of national surveillance systems and response measures for Aedes-borne diseases in France, Italy and Portugal: a benchmarking study, 2023

BackgroundRegions of southern Europe are increasingly colonised by <i>Aedes albopictus,</i> with incidence of autochthonous dengue cases rising in recent years.AimWe describe and compare <i>Aedes</i>-borne disease (dengue, chikungunya and Zika) incidence from 2017 to 2023, and the surveillance systems and response measures operating in France, Italy and Portugal in 2023, to improve surveillance, prevention, preparedness and response in Europe.MethodsWe performed a benchmarking analysis to systematically capture the systems used in each country. We collected data from key-informant interviews, national guidelines, reports and scientific literature using a standardised questionnaire adapted from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control framework.ResultsAll three countries have an integrated surveillance system for <i>Aedes</i>-borne diseases and share similarities in surveillance type, geographic coverage and case definitions. Differences entail mainly event-based and active surveillance activities. Geographic coverage of vector surveillance is national in France and Portugal but regional in Italy. In response to autochthonous transmission, all countries implement/foresee active case-finding and blood safety protocols, while France and Italy strongly rely on vector control. Upon vector detection in non-colonised areas, the three countries implement ad hoc entomological surveillance and vector control.ConclusionsSurveillance systems and response measures in France, Italy and Portugal are broadly similar, with variations reflecting differences in healthcare system organisation (centralised in Portugal and France, regionalised in Italy), <i>Ae. albopictus</i> distribution and local transmission of <i>Aedes-</i>borne diseases. Risk-based surveillance, considering the national and cross-border epidemiological and entomological situations, can strengthen preparedness and early warning for <i>Aedes</i>-borne diseases in Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eurosurveillance
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.es.2025.30.15.2400515
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Description and comparison of national surveillance systems and response measures for Aedes-borne diseases in France, Italy and Portugal: a benchmarking study, 2023

David T. Kelly, Berta Grau-Pujol, Emmanouil Alexandros Fotakis, Marco Di Luca et al.
2 citations
Eurosurveillance
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
3.76
article

Description and comparison of national surveillance systems and response measures for Aedes-borne diseases in France, Italy and Portugal: a benchmarking study, 2023

David T. Kelly, Berta Grau-Pujol, Emmanouil Alexandros Fotakis, Marco Di Luca, Flavia Riccardo, Tanja Charles, Maria João Alves, C. Piétin, Paula Vasconcelos, João Vieira Martins, Pedro Pinto Leite, Federica Ferraro, L. Ramalli, Giulietta Venturi, Florian Franke, Clémentine Calba
article en
2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundRegions of southern Europe are increasingly colonised by <i>Aedes albopictus,</i> with incidence of autochthonous dengue cases rising in recent years.AimWe describe and compare <i>Aedes</i>-borne disease (dengue, chikungunya and Zika) incidence from 2017 to 2023, and the surveillance systems and response measures operating in France, Italy and Portugal in 2023, to improve surveillance, prevention, preparedness and response in Europe.MethodsWe performed a benchmarking analysis to systematically capture the systems used in each country. We collected data from key-informant interviews, national guidelines, reports and scientific literature using a standardised questionnaire adapted from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control framework.ResultsAll three countries have an integrated surveillance system for <i>Aedes</i>-borne diseases and share similarities in surveillance type, geographic coverage and case definitions. Differences entail mainly event-based and active surveillance activities. Geographic coverage of vector surveillance is national in France and Portugal but regional in Italy. In response to autochthonous transmission, all countries implement/foresee active case-finding and blood safety protocols, while France and Italy strongly rely on vector control. Upon vector detection in non-colonised areas, the three countries implement ad hoc entomological surveillance and vector control.ConclusionsSurveillance systems and response measures in France, Italy and Portugal are broadly similar, with variations reflecting differences in healthcare system organisation (centralised in Portugal and France, regionalised in Italy), <i>Ae. albopictus</i> distribution and local transmission of <i>Aedes-</i>borne diseases. Risk-based surveillance, considering the national and cross-border epidemiological and entomological situations, can strengthen preparedness and early warning for <i>Aedes</i>-borne diseases in Europe.

EurosurveillanceVol. 30(15)
Robert Koch Institute (DE), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Ministero della Salute (IT), Santé Publique France (FR), Direção Geral do Território (PT), National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (PT), Agence Régionale de Santé Ile-de-France (FR), Institut thématique Santé Publique (FR), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.