Property rights, resource reallocation and welfare effects: Evidence from a land certification programme

The paper finds that stronger property rights proxied by land certification reform result in resource reallocation and improve the welfare of rural households. Using the implementation of the land certification programme in China as a quasi-natural experiment, the study shows that households that obtained land certificates are 19 % more likely to rent out their agricultural land , 14 % more likely to allocate household workers to non-agricultural sectors and 13 % more likely to have migrant workers , which improves household income and consumption in rural China. In contrast, the study finds that the land reform did not affect household’s land renting-in, and the average cultivated area of rural households declines after the reform. • Land certification reform boosts land rent-out, non-agricultural jobs and migration in rural China. • The land reform raises rural families' income and consumption. • The reform has no effect on household land rent-in, and farmers' cultivated area declines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107562
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Property rights, resource reallocation and welfare effects: Evidence from a land certification programme

Qingen Gai, Chengzheng Li, Zhiwen Huang, Hua Xie
7 citations
Land Use Policy
Land Rights and Reforms
8.30
article

Property rights, resource reallocation and welfare effects: Evidence from a land certification programme

Qingen Gai, Chengzheng Li, Zhiwen Huang, Hua Xie
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The paper finds that stronger property rights proxied by land certification reform result in resource reallocation and improve the welfare of rural households. Using the implementation of the land certification programme in China as a quasi-natural experiment, the study shows that households that obtained land certificates are 19 % more likely to rent out their agricultural land , 14 % more likely to allocate household workers to non-agricultural sectors and 13 % more likely to have migrant workers , which improves household income and consumption in rural China. In contrast, the study finds that the land reform did not affect household’s land renting-in, and the average cultivated area of rural households declines after the reform. • Land certification reform boosts land rent-out, non-agricultural jobs and migration in rural China. • The land reform raises rural families' income and consumption. • The reform has no effect on household land rent-in, and farmers' cultivated area declines.

Land Use PolicyVol. 154
Jinan University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), Columbia University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Land Rights and Reforms
8.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.