Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Reimbursed Cancer Medications Dispensed as Take-Home Treatments from 2017–2021

<b>Background:</b> The cost and uptake of cancer medications dispensed as take-home treatments are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, we describe trends and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications dispensed through the public payer system in Ontario, Canada. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a repeated cross-sectional time-series analysis examining monthly and fiscal-year trends in the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications reimbursed by the public payer between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2021, in Ontario, Canada. Our primary outcome was per-beneficiary spending. Total public payer spending and the number of unique beneficiaries who were dispensed take-home cancer medications were reported as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were reported overall and stratified by drug class. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to assess the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the aforementioned trends. <b>Results:</b> Annual per-beneficiary spending on take-home cancer medications increased by 32.8% (from CAD 4422 in 2017/18 to CAD 6579 in 2020/21) over the study period. The rise in per-beneficiary spending was driven by the cost of medications within the small-molecule targeted therapy and immunotherapy drug classes, which accounted for three-quarters of total public payer spending on take-home cancer medications in 2020/21 despite being dispensed to less than 8% of beneficiaries. Upon the declaration of emergency for SARS-CoV-2, a short-term decline in per-beneficiary spending (CAD -179 per month; <i>p</i>-value < 0.01) was observed between March and June 2020. This temporary decline was driven by an increase in the number of beneficiaries (5582 per month; <i>p</i>-value < 0.01) receiving low-cost take-home cancer medications within the cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy drug class without a corresponding rise in public payer spending. <b>Conclusion:</b> Future research should investigate barriers to the widespread uptake of take-home cancer medications during periods of public emergencies, particularly for high-cost drugs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040237
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Reimbursed Cancer Medications Dispensed as Take-Home Treatments from 2017–2021

Tonya Campbell, Mina Tadrous, Tara Gomes, Tara Dumont et al.
Current Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Trends in the Cost and Utilization of Publicly Reimbursed Cancer Medications Dispensed as Take-Home Treatments from 2017–2021

Tonya Campbell, Mina Tadrous, Tara Gomes, Tara Dumont, Ria Garg, Kelvin Y.K. Chan, Daniel McCormack
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The cost and uptake of cancer medications dispensed as take-home treatments are not well understood. Therefore, in this study, we describe trends and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications dispensed through the public payer system in Ontario, Canada. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a repeated cross-sectional time-series analysis examining monthly and fiscal-year trends in the utilization and cost of take-home cancer medications reimbursed by the public payer between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2021, in Ontario, Canada. Our primary outcome was per-beneficiary spending. Total public payer spending and the number of unique beneficiaries who were dispensed take-home cancer medications were reported as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were reported overall and stratified by drug class. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to assess the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the aforementioned trends. <b>Results:</b> Annual per-beneficiary spending on take-home cancer medications increased by 32.8% (from CAD 4422 in 2017/18 to CAD 6579 in 2020/21) over the study period. The rise in per-beneficiary spending was driven by the cost of medications within the small-molecule targeted therapy and immunotherapy drug classes, which accounted for three-quarters of total public payer spending on take-home cancer medications in 2020/21 despite being dispensed to less than 8% of beneficiaries. Upon the declaration of emergency for SARS-CoV-2, a short-term decline in per-beneficiary spending (CAD -179 per month; <i>p</i>-value < 0.01) was observed between March and June 2020. This temporary decline was driven by an increase in the number of beneficiaries (5582 per month; <i>p</i>-value < 0.01) receiving low-cost take-home cancer medications within the cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal therapy drug class without a corresponding rise in public payer spending. <b>Conclusion:</b> Future research should investigate barriers to the widespread uptake of take-home cancer medications during periods of public emergencies, particularly for high-cost drugs.

Current OncologyVol. 32(4)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.