Sexual Size Dimorphism Correlates With the Number of Androgen Response Elements in Mammals, But Only in Small-Bodied Species

Sexual size dimorphism is common throughout the animal kingdom, but its evolution and development remain difficult to explain given most of the genome is shared between males and females. Sex-biased regulation of genes via sex hormone signaling offers an intuitive mechanism by which males and females could develop different body sizes. One prediction of this hypothesis is that the magnitude of sexual size dimorphism scales with the number of androgen response elements or estrogen response elements, the DNA motifs to which sex hormone receptors bind. Here, we test this hypothesis using 268 mammalian species with full genome assemblies and annotations. We find that in the two smallest-bodied lineages (Chiroptera and Rodentia), sexual size dimorphism increases (male-larger) as the number of androgen response elements in a genome increases. In fact, myomorph rodents-which are especially small-bodied with high sexual size dimorphism-show an explosion of androgen receptor elements in their genomes. In contrast, the three large-bodied lineages (orders Carnivora, Cetartiodactyla, and Primates) do not show this relationship, instead following Rensch's Rule, or the observation that sexual size dimorphism increases with overall body size. One hypothesis to unify these observations is that small-bodied organisms like bats and rodents tend to reach peak reproductive fitness quickly and are more reliant on hormonal signaling to achieve sexual size dimorphism over relatively short time periods. Our study uncovers a previously unappreciated relationship between sexual size dimorphism, body size, and hormone signaling that likely varies in ways related to life history.