A STUDY OF THINKING STYLES OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN RELATION TO THEIR GENDER

The Present Study assessed the thinking Styles of Prospective Teacher's in relation to their Gender. The Sample Consisted of 371 Prospective teachers (Male=198, Female=173) who were selected From B.Ed. Colleges of Dr.B.R. A. University, Agra by using accidental technique of sample selection. In the Present study the Normative Survey method of Research was used. Thinking style Inventory Was Constructed by Sternberg & Wagner, as employed for Data collection. Gender is potentially relevant to the development of styles. Male and female Prospective teachers differed significantly in one thinking style only i.e. executive style.Female Prospective teachers tended to be more executive than male prospective teachers in their styles of thinking yon remaining styles no significant between male and Female prospective teachers were observed. These styles were integrated is Legislative, Judicial, monarchic, hierarchic, oligarchic, anarchic global, local, internal, External,Liberal and Conservative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i3.2025.6042
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A STUDY OF THINKING STYLES OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN RELATION TO THEIR GENDER

R. K. Dixit, Ruby Sharma
International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

A STUDY OF THINKING STYLES OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN RELATION TO THEIR GENDER

R. K. Dixit, Ruby Sharma
article en

Abstract

The Present Study assessed the thinking Styles of Prospective Teacher's in relation to their Gender. The Sample Consisted of 371 Prospective teachers (Male=198, Female=173) who were selected From B.Ed. Colleges of Dr.B.R. A. University, Agra by using accidental technique of sample selection. In the Present study the Normative Survey method of Research was used. Thinking style Inventory Was Constructed by Sternberg & Wagner, as employed for Data collection. Gender is potentially relevant to the development of styles. Male and female Prospective teachers differed significantly in one thinking style only i.e. executive style.Female Prospective teachers tended to be more executive than male prospective teachers in their styles of thinking yon remaining styles no significant between male and Female prospective teachers were observed. These styles were integrated is Legislative, Judicial, monarchic, hierarchic, oligarchic, anarchic global, local, internal, External,Liberal and Conservative.

International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAHVol. 13(3)
Hans Raj Mahila Maha Vidyalaya (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.