Quantitative fire likelihood assessment of battery home storage systems in comparison to general house fires in Germany and other battery related fires

Battery storage systems are becoming an integral part of the energy transition by enabling energy availability during periods of low renewable energy generation and by providing various grid services. Currently, the most battery storage systems are deployed in home storage systems (HSSs) and electric vehicles (EVs), and their growth continues exponentially. However, despite this upside development, there are public concerns about potential fire risks associated with photovoltaic (PV) home storage systems and EVs. This paper presents a quantitative analysis comparing statistics of fires occurring in HSS with fires in PV systems, in EV, internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and, general house fires. However, because of a lack of available data, HSS fire incidents in Germany for 2023 were determined through web crawling, while other probabilities were derived from already existing research data. The results show a significantly lower probability of an HSS fire compared with a general house fire. In detail, the findings indicate that the probability of an HSS fire is very low (0.005 %) and is 50 times lower than for a general house fire. All home appliances have a generally low probability of catching fire, which is also true for HSS. If compared to other home appliances, HSS share roughly the same probability of catching fire as tumble dryers. Furthermore, compared with the fire probability of HSS, PV systems demonstrate an even lower probability, approximately three times lower than that of HSS. The probability of a traditional ICE vehicle fire (0.089 %) is approximately four times higher than that of an EV fire. The probability of an HSS catching fire is approximately 18 times lower than an ICE catching fire and four times lower vs. an EV. These findings provide important insights into the risks and safety aspects of battery storage in the residential buildings, thus supporting to make informed decisions about integrating of renewable energy systems. • HSS fires 50 times less likely than house fires, four times less likely than EV fires. • HSS fires as likely as tumble dryer fires, three times more likely than PV fires. • Indoor HSS fires highlight need for better risk mitigation. • Standardized reporting essential for reliable HSS fire data

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116599
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative fire likelihood assessment of battery home storage systems in comparison to general house fires in Germany and other battery related fires

Jan Figgener, M. Junker, Dirk Uwe Sauer, Florian Hölting et al.
Journal of Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Quantitative fire likelihood assessment of battery home storage systems in comparison to general house fires in Germany and other battery related fires

Jan Figgener, M. Junker, Dirk Uwe Sauer, Florian Hölting, Aniket Kapse, Fabian Breer
article en

Abstract

Battery storage systems are becoming an integral part of the energy transition by enabling energy availability during periods of low renewable energy generation and by providing various grid services. Currently, the most battery storage systems are deployed in home storage systems (HSSs) and electric vehicles (EVs), and their growth continues exponentially. However, despite this upside development, there are public concerns about potential fire risks associated with photovoltaic (PV) home storage systems and EVs. This paper presents a quantitative analysis comparing statistics of fires occurring in HSS with fires in PV systems, in EV, internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles and, general house fires. However, because of a lack of available data, HSS fire incidents in Germany for 2023 were determined through web crawling, while other probabilities were derived from already existing research data. The results show a significantly lower probability of an HSS fire compared with a general house fire. In detail, the findings indicate that the probability of an HSS fire is very low (0.005 %) and is 50 times lower than for a general house fire. All home appliances have a generally low probability of catching fire, which is also true for HSS. If compared to other home appliances, HSS share roughly the same probability of catching fire as tumble dryers. Furthermore, compared with the fire probability of HSS, PV systems demonstrate an even lower probability, approximately three times lower than that of HSS. The probability of a traditional ICE vehicle fire (0.089 %) is approximately four times higher than that of an EV fire. The probability of an HSS catching fire is approximately 18 times lower than an ICE catching fire and four times lower vs. an EV. These findings provide important insights into the risks and safety aspects of battery storage in the residential buildings, thus supporting to make informed decisions about integrating of renewable energy systems. • HSS fires 50 times less likely than house fires, four times less likely than EV fires. • HSS fires as likely as tumble dryer fires, three times more likely than PV fires. • Indoor HSS fires highlight need for better risk mitigation. • Standardized reporting essential for reliable HSS fire data

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 122
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Helmholtz-Institute Münster (DE), Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.