Local office non-audit tax fee dependence and audit quality: a tax client relationship perspective

Purpose This study aims to examine how audit firms proactively respond to threats to independence posed by non-audit tax services. Specifically, this study adopts a local office non-audit tax service client relationship perspective to investigate whether dependence on non-audit tax fees at the office level affects auditor independence concerning the auditing of income tax accounts. Design/methodology/approach Using a baseline ordinary least squares regression model and additional analyses, this study tests the relationship between tax accrual quality and non-audit tax fee dependence at the office level. Findings This study finds that dependence on non-audit tax fees at the office level increases the accuracy of income tax accrual estimations, thereby supporting the existence of safeguards, such as quality controls over auditing income tax accounts, which protect auditor independence. The results are robust against alternative explanations, such as knowledge spillover, and are more pronounced in settings where local offices have greater reputational concerns or higher-risk engagements, as well as in contexts where regulatory scrutiny related to quality control over income tax accounts is heightened. Practical implications The findings suggest that heightened regulatory scrutiny and restrictions on auditors’ tax services have increased the importance of quality controls and other safeguards that can help ensure auditor independence. Due to reputation concerns, audit firms proactively manage significant non-audit tax service relationships with clients by implementing audit quality control procedures to avoid compromising audit objectivity. Originality/value This study adopts the perspective of local office partners and their reporting decisions related to non-audit tax service client relationships. This study documents how audit firms proactively respond to threats to independence imposed by significant non-audit tax service relationships with clients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial Auditing Journal
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-05-2024-4334
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local office non-audit tax fee dependence and audit quality: a tax client relationship perspective

Joseph R. Rakestraw, Jagadison K. Aier, Kellie M. Carr, Jian Cao
Managerial Auditing Journal
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Local office non-audit tax fee dependence and audit quality: a tax client relationship perspective

Joseph R. Rakestraw, Jagadison K. Aier, Kellie M. Carr, Jian Cao
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how audit firms proactively respond to threats to independence posed by non-audit tax services. Specifically, this study adopts a local office non-audit tax service client relationship perspective to investigate whether dependence on non-audit tax fees at the office level affects auditor independence concerning the auditing of income tax accounts. Design/methodology/approach Using a baseline ordinary least squares regression model and additional analyses, this study tests the relationship between tax accrual quality and non-audit tax fee dependence at the office level. Findings This study finds that dependence on non-audit tax fees at the office level increases the accuracy of income tax accrual estimations, thereby supporting the existence of safeguards, such as quality controls over auditing income tax accounts, which protect auditor independence. The results are robust against alternative explanations, such as knowledge spillover, and are more pronounced in settings where local offices have greater reputational concerns or higher-risk engagements, as well as in contexts where regulatory scrutiny related to quality control over income tax accounts is heightened. Practical implications The findings suggest that heightened regulatory scrutiny and restrictions on auditors’ tax services have increased the importance of quality controls and other safeguards that can help ensure auditor independence. Due to reputation concerns, audit firms proactively manage significant non-audit tax service relationships with clients by implementing audit quality control procedures to avoid compromising audit objectivity. Originality/value This study adopts the perspective of local office partners and their reporting decisions related to non-audit tax service client relationships. This study documents how audit firms proactively respond to threats to independence imposed by significant non-audit tax service relationships with clients.

Managerial Auditing JournalVol. 41(1)
Western Michigan University (US), George Mason University (US), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.