Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans for Cephalometric Mandibular Measurements in Thailand: A Retrospective Study

Objective: To evaluate whether 2D computerized tomography (CT) cephalometric measurements are comparable to 3D CT measurements of the mandible bone. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected data from patients who visited the emergency room of Songklanagarind Hospital between 2017 and 2020. A single operator identified 11 landmarks for cephalometric measurements in all images. Each image underwent three separate tracings, and subsequent repeated measurements were employed for further statistical analyses. Results: This study included 135 patients (87 males and 48 females). The mean age of the patients was 40.48±15 years. Nine of the eleven parameters showed a significant difference between the 2D and 3D cephalometric measurements (p-value<0.05). Male patients had a longer mandible than female patients, and there was a statistically significant size difference between the sexes (p-value<0.05), except for the mental foramen size (pair t-test >0.05). Length measurements displayed a statistically significant positive correlation with height and BSA (p-value<0.05), while no correlation was observed with body mass index (BMI) (p-value>0.05). Angle measurements did not exhibit any correlation with height, BSA, or BMI. Conclusion: In this study, 2D cephalometric measurements were significantly different from 3D CT measurements in each individual. Based on these findings, we recommend that surgeons should consider using 3D CT cephalometric measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PSU Medical Journal
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31584/psumj.2025271329
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans for Cephalometric Mandibular Measurements in Thailand: A Retrospective Study

Pattira Boonsri, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Sasigan Prapun
1 links
PSU Medical Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Comparison of Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans for Cephalometric Mandibular Measurements in Thailand: A Retrospective Study

Pattira Boonsri, Atthawit Mongkornwong, Sasigan Prapun
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether 2D computerized tomography (CT) cephalometric measurements are comparable to 3D CT measurements of the mandible bone. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, we collected data from patients who visited the emergency room of Songklanagarind Hospital between 2017 and 2020. A single operator identified 11 landmarks for cephalometric measurements in all images. Each image underwent three separate tracings, and subsequent repeated measurements were employed for further statistical analyses. Results: This study included 135 patients (87 males and 48 females). The mean age of the patients was 40.48±15 years. Nine of the eleven parameters showed a significant difference between the 2D and 3D cephalometric measurements (p-value<0.05). Male patients had a longer mandible than female patients, and there was a statistically significant size difference between the sexes (p-value<0.05), except for the mental foramen size (pair t-test >0.05). Length measurements displayed a statistically significant positive correlation with height and BSA (p-value<0.05), while no correlation was observed with body mass index (BMI) (p-value>0.05). Angle measurements did not exhibit any correlation with height, BSA, or BMI. Conclusion: In this study, 2D cephalometric measurements were significantly different from 3D CT measurements in each individual. Based on these findings, we recommend that surgeons should consider using 3D CT cephalometric measurements.

PSU Medical JournalVol. 5(1)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.