BOURNEA IS NOT SUPPORTED AS SEPARATE FROM OREOCHARIS(GESNERIACEAE)

The genus Bournea Oliv., established in 1893 and comprising two morphologically very similar species with actinomorphic flowers, was included in Oreocharis Benth. in 2011, essentially based on molecular data. However, a recent publication has suggested that Bournea should be maintained as a genus distinct from Oreocharis, based on morphological, palynological and DNA sequence data. By contrast, in another recent publication also based on DNA sequences, Bournea is placed within Oreocharis. The morphological, palynological and published molecular phylogenetic data are discussed here. The conclusion is that the overall evidence available is insufficient to support an independent genus, Bournea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edinburgh Journal of Botany
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24823/ejb.2025.2028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BOURNEA IS NOT SUPPORTED AS SEPARATE FROM OREOCHARIS(GESNERIACEAE)

Michael Moeller, David J. Middleton, Silvia Ulrich, Anton Weber
1 citations
Edinburgh Journal of Botany
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
0.81
article

BOURNEA IS NOT SUPPORTED AS SEPARATE FROM OREOCHARIS(GESNERIACEAE)

Michael Moeller, David J. Middleton, Silvia Ulrich, Anton Weber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The genus Bournea Oliv., established in 1893 and comprising two morphologically very similar species with actinomorphic flowers, was included in Oreocharis Benth. in 2011, essentially based on molecular data. However, a recent publication has suggested that Bournea should be maintained as a genus distinct from Oreocharis, based on morphological, palynological and DNA sequence data. By contrast, in another recent publication also based on DNA sequences, Bournea is placed within Oreocharis. The morphological, palynological and published molecular phylogenetic data are discussed here. The conclusion is that the overall evidence available is insufficient to support an independent genus, Bournea.

Edinburgh Journal of BotanyVol. 82
University of Vienna (AT), Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (GB), Institute of Archaeology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BOURNEA IS NOT SUPPORTED AS SEPARATE FROM OREOCHARIS(GESNERIACEAE) — Michael Moeller, David J. Middleton, et al. · Edinburgh Journal of Botany (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS