A laypeople’s typology of cosmetic surgeries using cluster analysis

Interest in cosmetic surgery has been steadily growing, with the term "cosmetic surgery" now serving as a broad label for a diverse array of aesthetic procedures. However, major differences exist between these treatments, raising questions about the validity of grouping them under a single, uniform category. Going beyond prior research that has typically treated cosmetic surgery as a rather homogeneous construct, we examine how people perceive cosmetic procedures and highlight the distinctions they may recognize between them. Using a cluster analysis methodology, we present the first systematic typology of cosmetic surgeries based on the perspective of laypeople. By considering key treatment characteristics such as invasiveness, visibility, and degree of transformation, we identify six distinct types of cosmetic procedures: (1) surgical augmentations, (2) surgical adjustments, (3) surgical reductions, (4) minimally invasive reductions, (5) minimally invasive augmentations, and (6) concealed surgical reductions. This new typology paves the path for future research to explore specific motives and expectations tied to each category, offering more fine-grained insights into the decision-making processes behind cosmetic surgery and a more nuanced understanding of public opinion about these procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96727-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A laypeople’s typology of cosmetic surgeries using cluster analysis

Michail D. Kokkoris, Mirella Kleijnen, Fabienne Krywuczky, Kobe Millet
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
4.61
article

A laypeople’s typology of cosmetic surgeries using cluster analysis

Michail D. Kokkoris, Mirella Kleijnen, Fabienne Krywuczky, Kobe Millet
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Interest in cosmetic surgery has been steadily growing, with the term "cosmetic surgery" now serving as a broad label for a diverse array of aesthetic procedures. However, major differences exist between these treatments, raising questions about the validity of grouping them under a single, uniform category. Going beyond prior research that has typically treated cosmetic surgery as a rather homogeneous construct, we examine how people perceive cosmetic procedures and highlight the distinctions they may recognize between them. Using a cluster analysis methodology, we present the first systematic typology of cosmetic surgeries based on the perspective of laypeople. By considering key treatment characteristics such as invasiveness, visibility, and degree of transformation, we identify six distinct types of cosmetic procedures: (1) surgical augmentations, (2) surgical adjustments, (3) surgical reductions, (4) minimally invasive reductions, (5) minimally invasive augmentations, and (6) concealed surgical reductions. This new typology paves the path for future research to explore specific motives and expectations tied to each category, offering more fine-grained insights into the decision-making processes behind cosmetic surgery and a more nuanced understanding of public opinion about these procedures.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A laypeople’s typology of cosmetic surgeries using cluster analysis — Michail D. Kokkoris, Mirella Kleijnen, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS