Evaluation of the Characteristics and Machine Learning-Based Identification Accuracy of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-8 Medical Equipment Auditory Alarms

Introduction Auditory alarms in clinical settings signal sudden changes in a patient's condition and failures in medical equipment. However, distinguishing between simultaneously sounding alarms, particularly when superimposed with various ambient sounds, remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for identifying auditory alarms issued by medical equipment. Methods We targeted old and new auditory alarms for medical equipment as specified in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-8 standard. First, we evaluated the characteristics of both normal and degraded auditory alarms using cosine similarity among old and new alarms. Next, we evaluated the accuracy of ML-based identification of deteriorated alarm sound sources in both the old and new alarm groups. Results The cosine similarity among old alarms was over 0.99, while new alarms ranged from 0.886 to 0.985, and exhibited more distinct characteristics. When noise was superimposed, the similarity among old alarms increased further, making differentiation more difficult. In contrast, for most new alarms, cosine similarity values exceeded 0.99 but retained slight acoustic differences even after noise-induced degradation, demonstrating improved distinguishability. The accuracy for identifying a single degraded alarm sound was 71.9% for the support vector machine. The models exhibited a high number of misclassifications when identifying the old alarms. Conversely, the models achieved higher accuracy when classifying new alarms, with recall exceeding 80%, precision above 70%, and F-measure greater than 80% for all new alarms. The identification accuracies for two simultaneous alarms were under 20% and approximately 50% for old and new alarms, respectively. The accuracy declined when estimating two simultaneous new alarms; however, when at least one of the two alarms was correctly classified, the accuracy exceeded 90%. Conclusions This study evaluated the characteristics of old and new auditory alarms issued by medical equipment as specified in IEC 60601-1-8 and constructed ML models for identifying the type of alarms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82488
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Characteristics and Machine Learning-Based Identification Accuracy of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-8 Medical Equipment Auditory Alarms

Kai Ishida, Kiyotaka Fujii
Cureus
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Evaluation of the Characteristics and Machine Learning-Based Identification Accuracy of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-8 Medical Equipment Auditory Alarms

Kai Ishida, Kiyotaka Fujii
article en

Abstract

Introduction Auditory alarms in clinical settings signal sudden changes in a patient's condition and failures in medical equipment. However, distinguishing between simultaneously sounding alarms, particularly when superimposed with various ambient sounds, remains challenging. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for identifying auditory alarms issued by medical equipment. Methods We targeted old and new auditory alarms for medical equipment as specified in the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-8 standard. First, we evaluated the characteristics of both normal and degraded auditory alarms using cosine similarity among old and new alarms. Next, we evaluated the accuracy of ML-based identification of deteriorated alarm sound sources in both the old and new alarm groups. Results The cosine similarity among old alarms was over 0.99, while new alarms ranged from 0.886 to 0.985, and exhibited more distinct characteristics. When noise was superimposed, the similarity among old alarms increased further, making differentiation more difficult. In contrast, for most new alarms, cosine similarity values exceeded 0.99 but retained slight acoustic differences even after noise-induced degradation, demonstrating improved distinguishability. The accuracy for identifying a single degraded alarm sound was 71.9% for the support vector machine. The models exhibited a high number of misclassifications when identifying the old alarms. Conversely, the models achieved higher accuracy when classifying new alarms, with recall exceeding 80%, precision above 70%, and F-measure greater than 80% for all new alarms. The identification accuracies for two simultaneous alarms were under 20% and approximately 50% for old and new alarms, respectively. The accuracy declined when estimating two simultaneous new alarms; however, when at least one of the two alarms was correctly classified, the accuracy exceeded 90%. Conclusions This study evaluated the characteristics of old and new auditory alarms issued by medical equipment as specified in IEC 60601-1-8 and constructed ML models for identifying the type of alarms.

CureusVol. 17(4)
Shonan Institute of Technology (JP), Kitasato University (JP)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.