Supporting resolution: the impact of supervisors on workplace conflict management

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of supervisors in managing workplace conflict, with a focus on introducing and empirically testing a new construct called Supervisor Conflict Management Support (SCMS). The results confirm a preliminary theory of how SCMS influences conflict resolution and organizational outcomes, including contextual factors such as conflict severity and expression norms. Design/methodology/approach This study uses survey data collected from a sample of 5,123 employees within the Federal Aviation Administration who reported experiencing workplace conflict. SCMS was measured alongside organizational constructs, including organizational commitment, conflict resolution and intent to stay. Data was analyzed using hierarchical regression and moderation analyses to test hypotheses and explore contextual effects. Convergent validity was tested using exploratory principal component analyses and was confirmed via average variance extracted tests for all constructs, whereas discriminant validity was supported through the Fornell–Larcker criterion and heterotrait–monotrait ratios. Findings The results demonstrate that SCMS significantly improves conflict resolution outcomes and enhances organizational commitment while increasing employees’ intent to stay. Moderation analyses revealed that SCMS is most effective when conflict is less severe and expression norms are open. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on supervisor conflict management in a safety-critical organization. Future research could explore different applications of SCMS and examine supervisors’ dual role as both conflict mitigators and contributors. Practical implications This study has practical implications for training managers on effective conflict management intervention and resolution strategies. Originality/value This study introduces SCMS as a novel construct and highlights supervisors’ critical role in fostering conflict resolution. By examining SCMS in a high-stakes organizational context, the findings contribute to advancing conflict management theory and offer practical insights for supervisory training that improves workplace conflict resolution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Conflict Management
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-10-2024-0276
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting resolution: the impact of supervisors on workplace conflict management

Jone L. Pearce, Karen McCarthy
1 citations
International Journal of Conflict Management
Conflict Management and Negotiation
4.20
article

Supporting resolution: the impact of supervisors on workplace conflict management

Jone L. Pearce, Karen McCarthy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of supervisors in managing workplace conflict, with a focus on introducing and empirically testing a new construct called Supervisor Conflict Management Support (SCMS). The results confirm a preliminary theory of how SCMS influences conflict resolution and organizational outcomes, including contextual factors such as conflict severity and expression norms. Design/methodology/approach This study uses survey data collected from a sample of 5,123 employees within the Federal Aviation Administration who reported experiencing workplace conflict. SCMS was measured alongside organizational constructs, including organizational commitment, conflict resolution and intent to stay. Data was analyzed using hierarchical regression and moderation analyses to test hypotheses and explore contextual effects. Convergent validity was tested using exploratory principal component analyses and was confirmed via average variance extracted tests for all constructs, whereas discriminant validity was supported through the Fornell–Larcker criterion and heterotrait–monotrait ratios. Findings The results demonstrate that SCMS significantly improves conflict resolution outcomes and enhances organizational commitment while increasing employees’ intent to stay. Moderation analyses revealed that SCMS is most effective when conflict is less severe and expression norms are open. Research limitations/implications This study focuses on supervisor conflict management in a safety-critical organization. Future research could explore different applications of SCMS and examine supervisors’ dual role as both conflict mitigators and contributors. Practical implications This study has practical implications for training managers on effective conflict management intervention and resolution strategies. Originality/value This study introduces SCMS as a novel construct and highlights supervisors’ critical role in fostering conflict resolution. By examining SCMS in a high-stakes organizational context, the findings contribute to advancing conflict management theory and offer practical insights for supervisory training that improves workplace conflict resolution.

International Journal of Conflict ManagementVol. 36(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.