Hydrogels with multiple RGD presentations increase cell adhesion and spreading

A key challenge in designing hydrogels for cell culture is replicating the cell-matrix interactions found in tissues. Cells use integrins to bind their local matrix and form adhesions in which integrins dynamically move on the cell membrane while applying significant forces to the local matrix. Identifying the important biomaterial features for these interactions is challenging because it is difficult to independently adjust variables such as matrix stiffness, stress relaxation, the mobility of adhesion ligands, and the ability of these ligands to support cellular forces. In this work, we designed a hydrogel platform consisting of interpenetrating polymer networks of covalently crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and self-assembled peptide amphiphiles (PA). We can tune the viscoelasticity of the hydrogel by modulating the composition of both networks. Ligand mobility can be adjusted independently of the matrix mechanical properties by attaching the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) cell adhesion ligand to either the covalent PEG network, the dynamic PA network, or both networks at once. We find that endothelial cell adhesion formation and spreading is maximized in soft gels in which adhesion ligands are present on both the covalent and non-covalent networks. The dynamic nature of adhesion domains, coupled with their ability to exert substantial forces on the matrix, suggests that having different presentations of RGD ligands which are either mobile or capable of withstanding significant forces is needed to mimic different aspects of complex cell-matrix adhesions. These results will contribute to the design of hydrogels that better recapitulate physiological cell-matrix interactions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Creating artificial environments that accurately mimic how cells interact with their surrounding matrix in natural tissues remains a fundamental challenge in biomaterials science. This study introduces a dual-network hydrogel platform that independently controls mechanical properties and adhesion ligand mobility by combining stable and dynamic polymer networks. A significant body of work has shown that matrix viscoelasticity and adhesion ligand mobility are important for cell adhesion and spreading. Our work builds on this by showing that endothelial cells function optimally when they can simultaneously engage with both mobile adhesion sites and force-resistant anchoring points, independent of matrix viscoelasticity. These insights will guide the design of more physiologically relevant hydrogels for tissue engineering applications and disease modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Biomaterialia
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2025.04.037
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogels with multiple RGD presentations increase cell adhesion and spreading

Wendy A. Breyer, E. Thomas Pashuck, Yingjie Wu, Abolfazl Salehi Moghaddam et al.
13 citations
Acta Biomaterialia
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
14.97
article

Hydrogels with multiple RGD presentations increase cell adhesion and spreading

Wendy A. Breyer, E. Thomas Pashuck, Yingjie Wu, Abolfazl Salehi Moghaddam, Katelyn Dunne
article en
13 citations

Abstract

A key challenge in designing hydrogels for cell culture is replicating the cell-matrix interactions found in tissues. Cells use integrins to bind their local matrix and form adhesions in which integrins dynamically move on the cell membrane while applying significant forces to the local matrix. Identifying the important biomaterial features for these interactions is challenging because it is difficult to independently adjust variables such as matrix stiffness, stress relaxation, the mobility of adhesion ligands, and the ability of these ligands to support cellular forces. In this work, we designed a hydrogel platform consisting of interpenetrating polymer networks of covalently crosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and self-assembled peptide amphiphiles (PA). We can tune the viscoelasticity of the hydrogel by modulating the composition of both networks. Ligand mobility can be adjusted independently of the matrix mechanical properties by attaching the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) cell adhesion ligand to either the covalent PEG network, the dynamic PA network, or both networks at once. We find that endothelial cell adhesion formation and spreading is maximized in soft gels in which adhesion ligands are present on both the covalent and non-covalent networks. The dynamic nature of adhesion domains, coupled with their ability to exert substantial forces on the matrix, suggests that having different presentations of RGD ligands which are either mobile or capable of withstanding significant forces is needed to mimic different aspects of complex cell-matrix adhesions. These results will contribute to the design of hydrogels that better recapitulate physiological cell-matrix interactions. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Creating artificial environments that accurately mimic how cells interact with their surrounding matrix in natural tissues remains a fundamental challenge in biomaterials science. This study introduces a dual-network hydrogel platform that independently controls mechanical properties and adhesion ligand mobility by combining stable and dynamic polymer networks. A significant body of work has shown that matrix viscoelasticity and adhesion ligand mobility are important for cell adhesion and spreading. Our work builds on this by showing that endothelial cells function optimally when they can simultaneously engage with both mobile adhesion sites and force-resistant anchoring points, independent of matrix viscoelasticity. These insights will guide the design of more physiologically relevant hydrogels for tissue engineering applications and disease modeling.

Acta BiomaterialiaVol. 199
Lehigh University (US), Bioengineering Center (RU)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
14.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.