To build or buy? Marketization of flexibility services in the Norwegian distribution grid

Electricity grids are expected to play a key role in energy transitions as facilitators that absorb the impacts of transitions in other sectors. This article examines how challenges with strained grid capacity are addressed through making local flexibility markets for trading end-user flexibility . Using the markets-in-the-making approach that conceives markets as framings (Callon, 2016, 2021), we examine the construction of conditions in which flexibility could be sold as a service to distribution grids in Norway. The empirical material analyzed consists of interviews with professionals in 2020–21 and observations from Norwegian Smart Grid Conferences (2020−2022). Our analysis focuses on selected processes seeking to create new frames for market transactions, including how flexibility is framed as an ‘explicit’ good by constructing measurement arrangements; how distribution grid companies are framed as buyers who need flexibility and can evaluate and use the flexibility good; and how framing seeks to make flexibility comparable with grid upgrades. We find that these framing processes seek to engage and transform a large number of actors to construct the evaluation arrangements for flexibility. We discuss how flexibility is framed to enable the articulation of flexibility's active impact on the grid and also to assure that flexibility activation is passive in other respects. We conclude that marketizing flexibility is not best understood as unlocking a vast, pre-existing resource but rather as a process of transforming actors and sociomaterial arrangements to shape flexibility into a knowable object that a wide array of actors can evaluate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104063
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To build or buy? Marketization of flexibility services in the Norwegian distribution grid

Antti Silvast, Outi Pitkänen
2 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
article

To build or buy? Marketization of flexibility services in the Norwegian distribution grid

Antti Silvast, Outi Pitkänen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Electricity grids are expected to play a key role in energy transitions as facilitators that absorb the impacts of transitions in other sectors. This article examines how challenges with strained grid capacity are addressed through making local flexibility markets for trading end-user flexibility . Using the markets-in-the-making approach that conceives markets as framings (Callon, 2016, 2021), we examine the construction of conditions in which flexibility could be sold as a service to distribution grids in Norway. The empirical material analyzed consists of interviews with professionals in 2020–21 and observations from Norwegian Smart Grid Conferences (2020−2022). Our analysis focuses on selected processes seeking to create new frames for market transactions, including how flexibility is framed as an ‘explicit’ good by constructing measurement arrangements; how distribution grid companies are framed as buyers who need flexibility and can evaluate and use the flexibility good; and how framing seeks to make flexibility comparable with grid upgrades. We find that these framing processes seek to engage and transform a large number of actors to construct the evaluation arrangements for flexibility. We discuss how flexibility is framed to enable the articulation of flexibility's active impact on the grid and also to assure that flexibility activation is passive in other respects. We conclude that marketizing flexibility is not best understood as unlocking a vast, pre-existing resource but rather as a process of transforming actors and sociomaterial arrangements to shape flexibility into a knowable object that a wide array of actors can evaluate.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 124
University of Helsinki (FI), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Department of Social Sciences (RU), National Consumer Research Centre (FI)
Strategiske Forskningsråd, Academy of Finland, Norges Forskningsråd, Strategic Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.