Impact of Bottoms Number on Draft Force Requirements and Stability of Moldboard Plow at Various Tillage Depths and Forward Speeds

The study aimed to evaluate the bottom effect of the numbers of different moldboard plows, namely single bottom (MB1), two bottoms (MB2), three bottoms (MB3), and four bottoms (MB4), three levels of forward speeds (3.17, 4.78, and 6.43 km h-1), and three levels of plowing depths (15, 20, and 25 cm) for the moldboard plow, and the interaction between these factors on draft force, fuel consumption, and longitudinal and lateral deflection of the moldboard plow. The experiments were carried out in the Basrah governorate (29° 31′N, 46° 48′ E). The experiment used a randomized complete block design with a split plot method for a factorial experiment (4 × 3 × 3) with three replicates. The results showed that increasing the number of bottoms from MB1 to MB4 reduced the draft force per bottom from 5.55 to 3.22 kN, fuel consumption from 18.83 to 14.72 L ha-1, lateral deflection from 4.58% to 2.22% and longitudinal deflection from 8.04% to 2.76%. Although increasing the speed from 3.17 to 6.43 km h-1 increased the draft force by 64.3%. Increasing the plowing depth from 15 to 30 cm increased the draft force from 3.50 to 7.84 kN, fuel consumption from 14.00 to 23.69 L ha-1, longitudinal deflection from 2.31% to 6.27%, and lateral deflection from 2.43% to 3.22%. The best performance was recorded when using the MB4 at a speed of 6.43 km h-1 and a depth of 15 cm, achieving the lowest draft force (3.22 kN), the lowest fuel consumption (10.00 L ha-1), and lateral and longitudinal deflection of 0.78% and 2.76%, respectively.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i43379
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Bottoms Number on Draft Force Requirements and Stability of Moldboard Plow at Various Tillage Depths and Forward Speeds

Abbas A. Mishall
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
article

Impact of Bottoms Number on Draft Force Requirements and Stability of Moldboard Plow at Various Tillage Depths and Forward Speeds

Abbas A. Mishall
article en

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the bottom effect of the numbers of different moldboard plows, namely single bottom (MB1), two bottoms (MB2), three bottoms (MB3), and four bottoms (MB4), three levels of forward speeds (3.17, 4.78, and 6.43 km h-1), and three levels of plowing depths (15, 20, and 25 cm) for the moldboard plow, and the interaction between these factors on draft force, fuel consumption, and longitudinal and lateral deflection of the moldboard plow. The experiments were carried out in the Basrah governorate (29° 31′N, 46° 48′ E). The experiment used a randomized complete block design with a split plot method for a factorial experiment (4 × 3 × 3) with three replicates. The results showed that increasing the number of bottoms from MB1 to MB4 reduced the draft force per bottom from 5.55 to 3.22 kN, fuel consumption from 18.83 to 14.72 L ha-1, lateral deflection from 4.58% to 2.22% and longitudinal deflection from 8.04% to 2.76%. Although increasing the speed from 3.17 to 6.43 km h-1 increased the draft force by 64.3%. Increasing the plowing depth from 15 to 30 cm increased the draft force from 3.50 to 7.84 kN, fuel consumption from 14.00 to 23.69 L ha-1, longitudinal deflection from 2.31% to 6.27%, and lateral deflection from 2.43% to 3.22%. The best performance was recorded when using the MB4 at a speed of 6.43 km h-1 and a depth of 15 cm, achieving the lowest draft force (3.22 kN), the lowest fuel consumption (10.00 L ha-1), and lateral and longitudinal deflection of 0.78% and 2.76%, respectively.

Journal of Experimental Agriculture InternationalVol. 47(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.