From Complex Network Perspective: Is Anecdotal Inference in Social Network Effective?

Anecdotes play a significant role in human communication and understanding. Inference on individual experiences and isolated cases is defined as anecdotal inference here. This study employs complex network methods to model the anecdotal inference to four small-scale sampling algorithm. The limitation is verified through theoretical derivation and numerical simulation. Theoretical result is marked by bias between the expected value, positively correlated with high-degree nodes’ attributes, and the latent parameters. Experimental result is shown by comparing results error of the algorithms in scale-free, small-world, random, and CNN network models, and the results validate the theoretical conclusion. Additionally, different network structural properties show varying influence on the error of estimated value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cait64506.2024.10963266
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Complex Network Perspective: Is Anecdotal Inference in Social Network Effective?

Ruichen Tang
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
article

From Complex Network Perspective: Is Anecdotal Inference in Social Network Effective?

Ruichen Tang
article en

Abstract

Anecdotes play a significant role in human communication and understanding. Inference on individual experiences and isolated cases is defined as anecdotal inference here. This study employs complex network methods to model the anecdotal inference to four small-scale sampling algorithm. The limitation is verified through theoretical derivation and numerical simulation. Theoretical result is marked by bias between the expected value, positively correlated with high-degree nodes’ attributes, and the latent parameters. Experimental result is shown by comparing results error of the algorithms in scale-free, small-world, random, and CNN network models, and the results validate the theoretical conclusion. Additionally, different network structural properties show varying influence on the error of estimated value.

Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.