Resilience in Online Federated Learning: Mitigating Model-Poisoning Attacks via Partial Sharing
Federated learning (FL) allows training machine learning models on distributed data without compromising privacy. However, FL is vulnerable to model-poisoning attacks where malicious clients tamper with their local models to manipulate the global model. In this work, we investigate the resilience of the partial-sharing online FL (PSO-Fed) algorithm against such attacks. PSO-Fed reduces communication overhead by allowing clients to share only a fraction of their model updates with the server. We demonstrate that this partial sharing mechanism has the added advantage of enhancing PSO-Fed's robustness to model-poisoning attacks. Through theoretical analysis, we show that PSO-Fed maintains convergence even under Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients inject noise into their updates. Furthermore, we derive a formula for PSO-Fed's mean square error, considering factors like stepsize, attack probability, and the number of malicious clients. Interestingly, we find a non-trivial optimal stepsize that maximizes PSO-Fed's resistance to these attacks. Extensive numerical experiments confirm our theoretical findings and showcase PSO-Fed's superior performance against model-poisoning attacks compared to other leading FL algorithms.
Authors
- Reza Arablouei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-2900)
- Stefan Werner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-4724)
- Vinay Chakravarthi Gogineni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2171-9623)
- Ehsan Lari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-0028)
Institutions
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Maersk (Denmark) (DK)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tsipn.2025.3559444
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.44