The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts

Abstract The present study deals with the adhesive selection for extrusion-based 3D-printed parts. The compatibility of acrylate (AC), polyurethane (PU), methyl methacrylate (MM) and epoxy (EP) adhesives with polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) adherends was investigated. Tensile tests were conducted to provide enhanced knowledge on the failure behavior of these joints. Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to the design of experiment (DOE) and to identify the contribution of each parameter on the response, respectively. In addition, a closed-form solution of critical stress (peel and shear stresses) distributions along the bondline was used to gain a better insight into the failure mechanism of joints considered in this study. The ANOVA results showed that the effect of adhesive type is clearly the most important factor influencing the joint strength, followed by the adherend type. Statistically, the contribution of the adherend type (5.28%) is also important, but it is smaller than the contribution of the adhesive type (91.60%). The highest joint strength was obtained for PETG bonded with MM adhesive. In the case of PU, EP, and AC adhesives, the maximum load-carrying capacity was reached using PLA adherends. ASA showed the lowest joint strength for all adhesive types. This research provides comprehensive knowledge, allowing designers to select an appropriate adhesive for custom or industrial bonding applications without time-consuming surface treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Welding in the World
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts

Fatih Huzeyfe Öztürk, Özkan Öz
3 citations
Welding in the World
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
article

The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts

Fatih Huzeyfe Öztürk, Özkan Öz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study deals with the adhesive selection for extrusion-based 3D-printed parts. The compatibility of acrylate (AC), polyurethane (PU), methyl methacrylate (MM) and epoxy (EP) adhesives with polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) adherends was investigated. Tensile tests were conducted to provide enhanced knowledge on the failure behavior of these joints. Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to the design of experiment (DOE) and to identify the contribution of each parameter on the response, respectively. In addition, a closed-form solution of critical stress (peel and shear stresses) distributions along the bondline was used to gain a better insight into the failure mechanism of joints considered in this study. The ANOVA results showed that the effect of adhesive type is clearly the most important factor influencing the joint strength, followed by the adherend type. Statistically, the contribution of the adherend type (5.28%) is also important, but it is smaller than the contribution of the adhesive type (91.60%). The highest joint strength was obtained for PETG bonded with MM adhesive. In the case of PU, EP, and AC adhesives, the maximum load-carrying capacity was reached using PLA adherends. ASA showed the lowest joint strength for all adhesive types. This research provides comprehensive knowledge, allowing designers to select an appropriate adhesive for custom or industrial bonding applications without time-consuming surface treatments.

Welding in the WorldVol. 69(9)
Karabük University (TR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Karabük Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.