De titulis Bosporanis et viciniis VII

The paper continues the series of comments, and corrections to some published inscrip tions from Cimmerian Bosporus. No 44 (fig. 1) discusses the worship of Athena Ergane in Pan ticapaeum in her possible relationship to Athena Polias on the background of reconstruction of the polis’ life in this city at the 1st quarter of the V CBC. No 45 (fig. 2) presents the correct lecture of the inscription on the bailer from the kurgan’s excavations in Rostov-on-Don region at 1927. No 46 (fig. 3–4) interprets the sings of the second line of inscription on the bronze caul dron founded in Volgograd region. Nos 47, and 70 returns to the interpretation of 18 times ἀνώνυμος in the lead tablet from Panticapaeum necropolis. No 48 proposes some observations concerning the lead letter of Oreios from Myrmekion. No 49 (fig. 5) argues about the Athena’s cult in Phanagoria. Nos 50–54 (fig. 6, 7. 2) reinterprets the graffiti of the beginning of AD from Phanagoria. Nos 55–56 insists that Herakas, and Sarmatas aren’t sarmatians anthroponyms but the hypocoristics of Greek names. Nos 57–61 (fig. 7. 3, 4; 8. 2) suggests some corrections to graffiti, and dipinti from Phanagoria. No 62 (fig. 8. 4) offers the new understanding of the beginning of lead letter from Patraeus. No 63 (fig. 8. 3) demonstrates that the famous graffito from Kyteion is the defixio. No 64 (fig. 9. 1) proves that the letter from Hermonassa talks about the legal proceedings concerning Kleidikos. No 65 (fig. 9. 3) corroborates the V. P. Yailenko’s lecture of the ostrakon from the Vyshestebliyevskaya-3. No 66 (fig. 9. 4) demonstrates that the lead letter founded on Mithridates’ mount in 1996 speaks about the guarantee on secu rity. No 67 (fig. 9. 2) proposes the correct lecture of the defixio from Panticapaeum. Nos 68–69 (fig. 9. 5) discusses some lists of names founded on Zenonus’ Chersonesos.