Navigating fairness: practitioners’ understanding, challenges, and strategies in AI/ML development

Abstract The rise in the use of AI/ML applications across industries has sparked more discussions about the fairness of AI/ML in recent times. While prior research on the fairness of AI/ML exists, there is a lack of empirical studies focused on understanding perspectives and experiences of AI practitioners in developing a fair AI/ML system. Understanding AI practitioners’ perspectives and experiences on the fairness of AI/ML systems is important because they are directly involved in its development and deployment and their insights can offer valuable real-world perspectives on the challenges associated with ensuring fairness in AI/ML systems. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 AI practitioners to investigate their understanding of what a ‘fair AI/ML’ is, the challenges they face in developing a fair AI/ML system, the consequences of developing an unfair AI/ML system, and the strategies they employ to ensure AI/ML system fairness. By exploring AI practitioners’ perspectives and experiences, this study provides actionable insights to enhance AI/ML fairness, which may promote fairer systems, reduce bias, and foster public trust in AI technologies. Additionally, we also identify areas for further investigation and offer recommendations to aid AI practitioners and AI companies in navigating fairness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10650-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating fairness: practitioners’ understanding, challenges, and strategies in AI/ML development

Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Burak Turhan, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn
4 citations
Empirical Software Engineering
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
article

Navigating fairness: practitioners’ understanding, challenges, and strategies in AI/ML development

Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Burak Turhan, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rise in the use of AI/ML applications across industries has sparked more discussions about the fairness of AI/ML in recent times. While prior research on the fairness of AI/ML exists, there is a lack of empirical studies focused on understanding perspectives and experiences of AI practitioners in developing a fair AI/ML system. Understanding AI practitioners’ perspectives and experiences on the fairness of AI/ML systems is important because they are directly involved in its development and deployment and their insights can offer valuable real-world perspectives on the challenges associated with ensuring fairness in AI/ML systems. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 AI practitioners to investigate their understanding of what a ‘fair AI/ML’ is, the challenges they face in developing a fair AI/ML system, the consequences of developing an unfair AI/ML system, and the strategies they employ to ensure AI/ML system fairness. By exploring AI practitioners’ perspectives and experiences, this study provides actionable insights to enhance AI/ML fairness, which may promote fairer systems, reduce bias, and foster public trust in AI technologies. Additionally, we also identify areas for further investigation and offer recommendations to aid AI practitioners and AI companies in navigating fairness.

Empirical Software EngineeringVol. 30(4)
Monash University (AU), University of Oulu (FI)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.