Arthur Pap in Vienna and the Criticism of Logical Empiricism

Abstract In the 1950s, after a year in Vienna, Arthur Pap published a monograph on the most recent developments in analytic philosophy ( Analytische Erkenntnistheorie , 1955), a book which can be read as a strong criticism of logical empiricism. I reconstruct the historical context in which the book was written and analyze Pap’s criticism of a core thesis of the logical empiricists: the linguistic theory of logical necessity. Against Rudolf Carnap and Friedrich Waismann, Pap argues for an absolute notion of necessity as a property of propositions conceived as abstract entities independent of language and linguistic conventions. I analyze Pap’s arguments against the logical empiricists as well as Rudolf Haller’s reaction to Pap’s criticism. Pap’s arguments can be seen as an attempt to give to analytic philosophy a re-orientation quite at odds with logical empiricism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Grazer Philosophische Studien
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18756735-00000225
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Arthur Pap in Vienna and the Criticism of Logical Empiricism

Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau
Grazer Philosophische Studien
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Arthur Pap in Vienna and the Criticism of Logical Empiricism

Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the 1950s, after a year in Vienna, Arthur Pap published a monograph on the most recent developments in analytic philosophy ( Analytische Erkenntnistheorie , 1955), a book which can be read as a strong criticism of logical empiricism. I reconstruct the historical context in which the book was written and analyze Pap’s criticism of a core thesis of the logical empiricists: the linguistic theory of logical necessity. Against Rudolf Carnap and Friedrich Waismann, Pap argues for an absolute notion of necessity as a property of propositions conceived as abstract entities independent of language and linguistic conventions. I analyze Pap’s arguments against the logical empiricists as well as Rudolf Haller’s reaction to Pap’s criticism. Pap’s arguments can be seen as an attempt to give to analytic philosophy a re-orientation quite at odds with logical empiricism.

Grazer Philosophische StudienVol. 101(3)
University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.